INintended·Feb 24, 2024
Anthromporphizing models lets assumptions of human behavior slip into discussions. Most people dont even know how their brains process information while models are not children.
New models appear to be close and based on arguments here, closing the gap is simply a matter of time. This is based on observing the rate of progress, not the actual underlying actions. A tendency belied by assumptions based on human thinking, not the signficant amounts of processing that happens unconciously by us.
Sure expanding the data set has improved results, yet bad hands, ghost legs, and other weirdness persist. If you have a world model, then this shouldn't happen - there is a logical rule to follow, not simply a pixel level correlation.
Working from the other side, if image/video gen has reached the point that it is faithfully recreating 3D rules, then
Read the rest
we should expect 3D wireframes to be generated. We should see an update to https://github.com/openai/point-e.
This isn't splitting hairs - this behavior can be hand waved away when building a PoC, not when you make a production ready product.
As for scams, they target weaknesses, not the strongest parts of a verification processes, making them strawmen arguments for AI capabilty.