STstabbles·Oct 12, 2026
In Terence Tao: Math 2.0 [pdf]openai
PrimeGaps186
Lean2026–2026
openai / PrimeGaps186
PrimeGaps186
Conditional Lean formalization and numerical certificate for prime gaps at most 186.
6Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
170GitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
Conditional Lean formalization and numerical certificate for prime gaps at most 186.
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use has been verified yet.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by week6 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2026-09-03 19:18:56 UTC to 2026-10-12 21:38:37 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31 | 2026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Sep 7 | 2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 14 | 2026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-09-21 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 21 | 2026-09-21 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-09-28 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 28 | 2026-09-28 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-10-05 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 5 | 2026-10-05 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-10-12 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 12 | 2026-10-12 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-10-19 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
What Hacker News says
6 sourcesWith very little review: https://github.com/openai/PrimeGaps186/blob/main/formalizati...
"No independent human semantic review. Whole-file sorry counts and a complete auxiliary-declaration audit are not established; separate declaration lint has not been run."
In GPT-6 AstraI'm surprised the OpenAI employee who pushed this didn't take the minute or two to format README.md to use GitHub-supported LaTeX (https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/wor...)
edit: my comment was on the submission for https://github.com/openai/PrimeGaps186 but seems to have been moved to the main Astra submission
In GPT-6 AstraSuch a result should be considered worthless: the proof is 10MB of Lean. (https://github.com/openai/PrimeGaps186).
I can't think of a single mathematical proof being anywhere close to ten million characters. For all you know, 90% of the proof could be useless, 8% would be writing out Shakespeare, and 1% abusing another bug in Lean. Humanity gets zero value from that, aside from "some bot seems to think it's 186". Unusable by anyone.
In GPT-6 Astra