HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
openfaas
faasd
Go2020–2021
openfaas / faasd

faasd

Lightweight and portable version of OpenFaaS

4Distinct people
25Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Lightweight and portable version of OpenFaaS

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:28:18 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month25 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-02-06 13:53:38 UTC to 2021-11-20 08:58:15 UTC.

012342020-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 20202020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments2020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2021-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2021-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2021-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2021-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 2021

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 20202020-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 20202020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 20202020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC220
May 20202020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Jun 20202020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 20202020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Aug 20202020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20202020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Oct 20202020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC211
Nov 20202020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC422
Dec 20202020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jan 20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-02-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Feb 20212021-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-03-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Mar 20212021-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20212021-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-05-01 00:00:00 UTC202
May 20212021-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20212021-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 20212021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-08-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Aug 20212021-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20212021-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20212021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20212021-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-12-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
I was joined by Taylor Dolezal for this live stream and was surprised to learn that Taylor has not only tried OpenFaaS before, but used it in two jobs - including at Disney. After the intro, we talk a bit about Go features like testing and newer features like generics, before going into a bit of a deep dive coding session, building up functions from scratch in Golang. The functions built with OpenFaaS are actually containers with a HTTP server inside, so they can be deployed to Kubernetes, Cloud Run or Knative in a similar way. They would probably also work with fly (but I haven't tried that yet) The "workload" definition is HTTP on port 8080 and a health check (configurable) https://docs.openfaas.com/reference/workloads/ For folks starting out with FaaS and not ready to go full-on K8s, faasd might be a good option to explore - https://gi
Read the rest
thub.com/openfaas/faasd - it has containerd and CNI (just like K8s) but no clustering so it's faster and has a sub-second cold-start.
In Introduction to Serverless Golang with OpenFaaS [video]
Disclaimer, I am a CNCF Ambassador (voluntary) - so it's in my interest to promote CNCF projects like Kubernetes. It seems like a good time to mention my blog post from last year "Then he asked me “Is Kubernetes right for us?" -> https://alexellisuk.medium.com/then-he-asked-me-is-kubernete... Some of the feedback I've had so far is that it was refreshing to get "permission" to consider alternatives vs. the current hype. I use K8s and K3s quite broadly myself, but increasingly see consulting prospects and customers who are not comfortable to make the leap, but are very happy on managed services with their chosen vendor - Azure / AWS / GCP. GitLab recently released a bunch of terraform to show you how to run side projects in the free tier of a cloud - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/5-minute-production-app/deploy... The OpenFaaS project again
Read the rest
is very coupled to Kubernetes, making it easier to use and more reliable is important to the community and project's future. However, we created a version called faasd that works more like docker-compose. It's received much more traction than we expected and companies and individuals are putting it into production. It does't have clustering, and supports only 1 replica per function, so it's surprising. https://github.com/openfaas/faasd I'll keep doing my bit to promote solutions that make K8s easier to understand like K3s (see also https://k3sup.dev) and to look into alternatives. But as you will see in my blog post - I don't think it's right to assume Kubernetes is the right solution for every team, and every project, without first talking about the problem being solved.
In Kubernetes Failure Stories

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.