HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
openjdk-mirror
jdk7u-jdk
Java2017–2024
openjdk-mirror / jdk7u-jdk

jdk7u-jdk

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

8Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
542GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 5:05:26 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-08-23 18:23:14 UTC to 2024-10-02 23:01:26 UTC.

0122017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

2 sources
You likely won't be writing many algorithms or data structures from scratch. You'll be implementing them, though! In practice, you'll be so busy seeing the forest for the trees, tackling the business case at hand, you'll rarely be fussing over textbook definitions. Often, when I see someone focusing too much on book smarts and interviewing in itself it's a sign they may need to put their reading and memorization into practice more. This is why I'm skeptical of job interviews - these things cater toward those who memorize them (likely fresh out of college), not devs on the field of battle shipping stuff for a few years. Memorizing arbitrary stuff out of a text book when you have libraries already there and deadlines? Come on. In the rare event you need to write your own thing, you'll ask the manager for time to clear up airspace and study
Read the rest
not from the textbook, but other's successful implementations, at a time when it actually matters. Here's how I'd improve it: find implementations of linked lists, queues, stacks, graphs, and whatever in programming languages, their standard libraries, and community frameworks. Show people the utility, have them conceptualize it internally, rather than memorize it. Here are some off the top of my head: Something broad and standardized, templated containers of data structures, like C++'s stdlib and its vector, map, and so on. Last time I checked chromium's source tree, std:: was everywhere: https://cs.chromium.org/search/?q=std::+package:chromium&sq=... Something low-level and cool, like Python's timsort: https://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Objects/listsor.... (Java actually ended up borrowing that: https://github.com/openjdk-mirror/jdk7u-jdk/blob/master/src/...) Something high-level, for instance, django-treebeard's approaches toward handling hierarchies in Django. In this package, adjacency lists (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjacency_list) are carried over not just to relational databases, but an ORM system. (https://django-treebeard.readthedocs.io)
In A computer science study plan
boolean hasName(String storedName) { return getLoadNames().\ contains(storedName); } > That’s it. No more looping, just a simple check. And how is set.contains implemented? https://github.com/openjdk-mirror/jdk7u-jdk/blob/master/src/... wraps https://github.com/openjdk-mirror/jdk7u-jdk/blob/master/src/... public boolean contains(Object o) { return map.containsKey(o); // map is HashMap } public boolean containsKey(Object key) { return getEntry(key) != null; } And finally: final Entry<K,V> getEntry(Object key) { int hash = (key == null) ? 0: \ hash(key.hashCode()); for (Entry<K,V> e = \ table[indexFor(hash, \ table.length)]; e != null; e = e.next) { Object k; if (e.hash == hash && ((k = e.key)
Read the rest
== key \ || (key != null \ && key.equals(k)))) return e; } return null; } TL;DR how did they imagine a general setContains would be implemented without a loop? [ed: obviously it makes sense to use a datastructure that more closely match your intent, but the wording here struck me as a bit odd...]
In Code Smells: Iteration

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.