HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
openjdk
jdk
Java2019–2026
openjdk / jdk

jdk

JDK main-line development https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk

93Distinct people
129Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
23.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

JDK main-line development https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 10:01:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year129 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-04-25 22:04:17 UTC to 2026-10-25 02:47:45 UTC.

01020302019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 1 submissions, 16 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 0 submissions, 17 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 28 mentions; 5 submissions, 23 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 22 mentions; 4 submissions, 18 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 2 submissions, 10 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 20 mentions; 5 submissions, 15 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17116
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17017
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC28523
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC22418
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC12210
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC20515

What Hacker News says

6 sources
> I had really high hopes for the Java AOT stuff but it seemed to stall (maybe I missed something). Project Leyden [1] aims to standardise AOT for the Java Platform. It is planned to start sometime in the new year. We will most likely end up with two implementations of it. One is GraalVM's native image which will most likely need to make some changes in order to follow the specification. And another implementation will likely be one that is based on HotSpot's C2 compiler [2][3]. [1] https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/05/java-leyden/ [2] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/960#issuecomment-7220230... [3] https://cl4es.github.io/2020/12/06/Towards-OpenJDK-17.html
In Why Java Is Dying
Still does. Example: https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/index.htm... https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/sha... I think Gophers borrowed the idea of generating docs from header/source comment from Java. Java itself spec'd it in 1996. Where did Gosling and friends got the idea, I don't know. It may have precedents either in Sun's other languages or possibly an earlier precedent. Some relatively minor differences: In Go, documentation is externalized IFF top level code (function, type, var defs and declarations) immediately follows a comment line. In Java comments have two forms. The comment form using two asterisks is externalized. In Go comments (iirc) support some very basic text styling (of the generated doc). In Java externalized comments can use a basic set of markup ala HTML. This includes comment
Read the rest
level hyperlinks to javadocs of referenced elements. Having used both languages rather extensively, Go's approach lends itself to CLI usage. Java provides richer markup and hyperlinks via java and is much better for someone who wants to explore the API via documentation.
In Go modules have a v2+ problem
But Java doesn't do stream fusion as you're describing. It does conventional inlining and combining loop bodies, which can in some trivial cases achieve the same effect, but these are techniques you'd find in any compiler or even an 80s text book - they didn't come from Haskell. Here's the limitation of Java's 'fusion' - you'll notice there's no pass to do this in Hotspot - it just happens due to the inlining and GCM passes. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/883a4f65b9b1533c8a51d156... And here's a paper on trying to add actual Fusion to Java, which they wouldn't be doing if Java had it already. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3355378.3355386?download=...
In Haskell for a New Decade [pdf]

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.