HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
openjdk
jdk
Java2019–2026
openjdk / jdk

jdk

JDK main-line development https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk

93Distinct people
129Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
23.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

JDK main-line development https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:01:12 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year129 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-04-25 22:04:17 UTC to 2026-10-25 02:47:45 UTC.

01020302019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 1 submissions, 16 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 0 submissions, 17 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 28 mentions; 5 submissions, 23 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 22 mentions; 4 submissions, 18 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 2 submissions, 10 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 20 mentions; 5 submissions, 15 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17116
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17017
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC28523
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC22418
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC12210
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC20515

What Hacker News says

12 sources
This is calling up dim old memories of Java (which I haven't used in years) and boxing primitive float values into Float objects which provide their own implementation of equals() and hashCode(). AFAICT the pre-hash values come from this method [0] which returns an integer which is a 1:1 representation of the float bytes except that NaNs are all collapsed to one canonical form. So at least at this phase, it doesn't quantize any virtually-equal floats together. Skimming an implementation of HashMap [1], I didn't notice any obvious "do something special for Floats" code. [0] https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/java.base... [1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/sha...
In Using floating point numbers as hash keys (2017)
Java has a bunch of code which looks like it's trying to do the right kind of escaping for msvcrt vs cmd.exe: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/jdk-26%2B1/src/java.base... But i would be lying if i said i understood what was going on there. Some googling suggests this was added around 1.7, ie in the early 2010s. But then, that Rust CVE seems to originate in this work, and this guy claims Java said "won't fix", which suggests it is vulnerable: https://flatt.tech/research/posts/batbadbut-you-cant-securel... But there's no link, and i can't find any discussion about it, so i don't know what the actual situation is.
In The curious case of shell commands, or how "this bug is required by POSIX" (2021)
> if javac involves IR, SSA based analysis and transformation (which I assume it does) https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/jdk.compiler/... I am fairly certain that it does not. The JVM is a stack-machine. I wrote a compiler for a simple programming language that compiled down to JVM bytecode for a project in the early 2010s. Its output for test programs was as fast as the comparative Java ones because they were fairly similar at the bytecode level. The HotSpot JVM is where all the optimization effort is applied.
In TinyCompiler: A compiler in a week-end
In A better build system for OCaml

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.