HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
OpenVPN
easy-rsa
Shell2015–2025
OpenVPN / easy-rsa

easy-rsa

easy-rsa - Simple shell based CA utility

11Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
4.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

easy-rsa - Simple shell based CA utility

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-01-04 08:30:11 UTC to 2025-02-18 13:48:53 UTC.

0123452015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

12 sources
If anyone wants their own HSM, Nitrokey and Yubikey sell them: * https://shop.nitrokey.com/shop/nkhs2-nitrokey-hsm-2-7 * https://www.yubico.com/product/yubihsm-2-series/yubihsm-2/ Consider buying two to have backups ((encrypted) export/import-backup/restore is supported). Creating your own CA: * https://docs.nitrokey.com/hsm/mac/certificate-authority Considering using 'helper software' for running a CA: * https://github.com/smallstep / https://smallstep.com/docs/step-ca/ * https://github.com/OpenVPN/easy-rsa * https://hohnstaedt.de/xca/ * https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert (good for on-one-host dev stuff)
In The Backbone of Cybersecurity: Hardware Security Modules
Depending on the criticity of your protected service, you could probably just be your own Certificate Authority, and publish the root certificate internally. How many machines are we talking about? A local PKI is probably overkill. Do you intend to give every single coworker a certificate on their own smartcard? If not, PKI is most probably not needed. https://github.com/OpenVPN/easy-rsa + two USB thumb drives in a safe (primary + backup) + one off-site in another safe. Client certificates are kind of hard to ask a global PKI for, because you usually use some internal names, not public FQDNs...
In Ask HN: Where do you get CA validated “Client Certificates”?
Personally, I tend to use the easy-rsa set of scripts https://github.com/OpenVPN/easy-rsa. Initially they used to come as a goodies with OpenVPN, but they are now provided as a standalone project. There are already packaged and available in most distributions (easy-rsa package under Debian for example). There are probably a little bit more complex to use, but it's far from horrible, and it's quite battle tested.
In Show HN: I made a script to generate self-signed SSL certs for local development
Easy-rsa[1] (OpenVPN's key/cert generation/signing tool) version 3 will generate a 2048 bit diffie hellman key by default. Previous versions of easy-rsa used 1024 bit as default. Here is a comment written in the vars configuration file for easy-rsa 2.2.2: # Increase this to 2048 if you # are paranoid. This will slow # down TLS negotiation performance # as well as the one-time DH parms # generation process. export KEY_SIZE=1024 So if you used easy-rsa version 2.2.2 or previous to generate your diffie hellman key for the server, and didn't increase the default size in the vars file before doing so, your server uses a 1024 bit diffie hellman key. [1]https://github.com/OpenVPN/easy-rsa
In How to Protect Yourself from NSA Attacks on 1024-bit DH
While not the only one out there[1], I've been hacking a cli tool written in bash[2] to streamline the OpenSSL commands geared toward a PKI/CA workflow. I started it mainly for my overall learning of OpenSSL from nothing and for my small scale needs with my CoreOS servers. What I learned from this exercise, is that it's not the complexity of the commands that is the issue with OpenSSL, it's: 1) The importance of consistent naming schemes (for the humans) and PKI hierarchy design (the nuances of keyUsage, basicConstraints, and extendedKeyUsage) 2) consistent execution of commands; typos are more likely the more you have to put in the CLI manually 3) good configuration files aren't utilized enough in most of the tutorials I found. They can streamline use, archive procedure, and prevent typos as in point #2. 4) The importing of certs and key
Read the rest
s in an automatic way is a sort of dark corner of the tutorial world. But permissions are super important! I came up with an import strategy that I think works pretty well.[3] Please examine and break it! [1]https://github.com/OpenVPN/easy-rsa [2]https://github.com/brianclements/pkictl [3]https://github.com/brianclements/pkictl#import
In TinyCert – Become Your Own PKI/CA Authority in a Matter of Minutes
From the TLS sysadmin deployment guide(https://weakdh.org/sysadmin.html): > Generate a Strong, Unique Diffie Hellman Group. A few fixed groups are used by millions of servers, which makes them an optimal target for precomputation, and potential eavesdropping. Administrators should generate unique, 2048-bit or stronger Diffie-Hellman groups using "safe" primes for each website or server. Is this why with the easy-rsa package (https://github.com/OpenVPN/easy-rsa) one should always build a dh pair first? People are using pre-seeded ones when they do not use this tool first!? That is scary.
In Logjam TLS attack

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.