HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
overleaf
web
JavaScript2016–2019
overleaf / web · Archived

web

The web front end for Overleaf, a web-based collaborative LaTeX editor

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
360GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The web front end for Overleaf, a web-based collaborative LaTeX editor

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:24:10 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-08-03 12:12:48 UTC to 2019-05-07 07:50:22 UTC.

012016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Hello, cofounder of Overleaf here. Just to be clear, open source development of ShareLaTeX is ongoing and indeed has accelerated since Overleaf and ShareLaTeX joined forces. ShareLaTeX is split into many repos, and the one linked above is a 'coordinator' repo that doesn't get updated much. See https://github.com/sharelatex/web-sharelatex for one that is more active. The free version of Overleaf/ShareLaTeX does have a restriction on the number of collaborators: you plus one other. Paid accounts support more collaborators [1], and you can also get more collaborators on the free account by referring others [2]. [1] https://www.overleaf.com/user/subscription/plans [2] https://www.overleaf.com/user/bonus (requires an account)
In Open source collaborative text editors
I use my iPad Pro for taking note taking during lectures and for reading. I would love to be able to use it for LaTeX too, however ShareLaTeX has a bug [0] making it impossible to navigate text using the arrow keys. For programming and other more technical things I do not see any reason to use the iPad. MacBooks are lightweight and more competent machines – the only thing worrying me is Apple's recent lack of interest for macOS and the Mac overall. [0] https://github.com/sharelatex/web-sharelatex/issues/611
In Working on an iPad Pro as my main computer
DataJoy Co-founder here. A lot of the DataJoy code IS available (https://github.com/sharelatex/web-sharelatex/tree/datajoy). Our other product ShareLaTeX has an open-source version that you can run locally and is very similar to the version we host at sharelatex.com. DataJoy naturally shares a lot of code with ShareLaTeX (if you look at the two products, you'll see they're very similar). However, with DataJoy, we never got the product to a stage where we felt it made sense to invest time into 'good open source' (documentation, installation guides, etc), but the 'code dump open source' version has always been there. The main thing that isn't open source with DataJoy is our backend for running code. At the moment this is so tied into Docker, S3, and how we deploy it in our infrastructure, that I don't think it would be much use to anyone el
Read the rest
se. The innovations here have been in how we deploy and provision it, not in the code itself.
In DataJoy is shutting down

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.