HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
passteque
gluetun
Go2022–2026
passteque / gluetun

gluetun

VPN client in a thin Docker container for multiple VPN providers, written in Go, and using OpenVPN or Wireguard, DNS over TLS, with a few proxy servers built-in.

11Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
16.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

VPN client in a thin Docker container for multiple VPN providers, written in Go, and using OpenVPN or Wireguard, DNS over TLS, with a few proxy servers built-in.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-07-04 14:19:30 UTC to 2026-06-25 04:11:17 UTC.

012342022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

12 sources
I strongly suggest that you use something like Network Namespaces through Vopono[0] or Gluetun[1] if you use a commercial VPN for "privacy" or "security" aka torrenting and shitposting. Relying on these clients is always a gamble and if your software (Browser, Torrentclient, etc.) cannot know you public IP only the internal IP of the VPN you are also safe against some exploits and misconfigurations a desktop client won't protect you against. [0] https://github.com/jamesmcm/vopono [1] https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun
In PureVPN IPv6 Leak
I've been using the LSIO Webtop images for a few years. They're awesome for composable desktops that I run behind a VPN for a quick and easy dirty connection at home. Combine the Webtop images by forcing it's traffic through the Gluetun [0] container and you're up and running. These Webtop containers are nice and snappy as well thanks to Kasm. Awesome OSS. [0] https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun
In Webtop – Alpine,Ubuntu,Fedora,and Arch containers containing full desktop envs
The purpose of Gluetun is to isolate your VPN into a container that you can then bind as the network provider of other containers. However, it's a documented problem [0] that performance isn't anywhere near as good as running the VPN natively, especially for Wireguard. At the minimum this can be related on some systems to the container being unable to load the kernel-space driver and having to rely on lower performing user-space driver, but even with a pre-loaded kernel-space driver performance testing is reporting significant lower values than the host. Presumably this project is to try and resolve that issue. [0] https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun/wiki/Wireguard#performance
In Dwgd: Docker WireGuard Driver
I'd never heard of Technitium, but was intrigued looking at. Was thinking "hmmm what could I do with this" and then had to refrain from creating another project just because. TBH I find Docker networking a struggle and usually disable the `iptables` stuff and end up configuring my own rules. Painful, but at least less intrusive. On the note of Tailscale+Docker networking, gluetun[0] is pretty awesome. It runs a Wireguard (not tailscale compatible, yet) instance within a Docker container and then you share that networking namespace with the other containers effectively confining them to the VPN. Comes with basic container namespace firewall configuration and DNS over TLS configuration. [0] https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun
In Surpassing 10Gb/S over Tailscale

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.