wrightverification

Multi-sig wallets weren't invented until 3-4 years after the initial release of bitcoin (I can't pin down an exact date, but I believe it was some time in 2012). Craig claims (or at least, has previously claimed) that he controls an address that is well-known to belong to Satoshi[0]. Turns out, the proof he provided is fake[1]. In my opinion, when you say "I have hard proof, here it is" and it turns out that proof is faked we can throw all the circumstantial evidence out the window. As you seem to believe him (at least more than you doubt), I'd be interested in your thoughts on why Craig would act this way if he actually was Satoshi. 0: https://web.archive.org/web/20160502072011/http://www.drcrai... 1: https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification

Grifting conman. A walk down memory lane on one of his previous attempts to demonstrate he was Satoshi: https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification/blob/master/RE... The one positive thing I can say about Bitcoin is that it gives someone who is factually Satoshi an extremely easy way to prove that fact in a way which is extremely difficult for anyone else in the world to forge. Wright hasn’t because he can’t because he isn’t.