HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
pazz
alot
Python2012–2024
pazz / alot

alot

Terminal-based Mail User Agent

12Distinct people
18Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
749GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Terminal-based Mail User Agent

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

If you like sup-mail, I recommend also trying notmuch via alot. https://notmuchmail.org/ https://github.com/pazz/alot There are other options if you don't like alot. See:…

BeetleB used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 8:03:49 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-07-07 00:09:50 UTC to 2024-08-22 19:54:05 UTC.

01232012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Hm, we're too deep it seems. So replying to myself. > You must be aware that notmuch is only the search backend, and for a full MUA you need frontends. Absolutely. I tried to imply that with my wry parenthesis; but it's absolutely worth pointing out clearly to unwary readers. In no way is it fair to either notmuch or sup to compare the two as equals. I'd probably lean towards mutt-kz[mk] for an out-of-box "notmuch" mua (but... mutt. Meh ;-) There's also "alot"[a]. > Another contender in the space (label- and search-centric) is mu and its ui, mu4e [1]. Something else to have in mind. Right. See also: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/mail.html Recently discussed on hn: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8519643 > Now if you want something that works on desktop and mobile, something worth a look would be using SQLite and its built-in full-text
Read the rest
search... see how far you can go with that. SQLite is available pretty much everywhere, Android even allows full-text search. Now what you have to do is synchronize SQLite dbs. It "shouldn't" be too hard to remove old emails from the db so you can keep X MB worth of it. You can even shoehorn it into couchbase-lite [3][4] so that sync is automagically taken care of. I've considered sqlite for some of these reasons. But couchbase-lite != sqlite, right? (Or does it use sqlite in a meaningful way; ie: can/should one use sql to interface with the stored data?). Btw, looks like you're off-by-one, in your references ;-) If using sqlite, there are a couple of schemas one might use for inspiration, such as dbmail: http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/lib/exe/fetch.php/dbmail-er-model... Or archiveopteryx: http://archiveopteryx.org/db/schema The main sticking point, is do we really want(need) to re-index everything everywhere, how do we transparently do search local-first, while supporting hits from the server along with fetching hits/mails that are missing locally (what k9 calls "cloud search") - how do we consolidate/sync data (the two hard things in computer science is caching and naming things...). I'm not entirely convinced sqlite+built-in full text search is the best approach (I envision a useful search across some gbs of mailing list threads -- not convinced about the ranking -- but I could very well be the victim of premature optimization. And I'm a little wary of abandoning maildir for storage (on the server) -- but that might be useful anyway. > JMAP looks cool (definitely more interesting to implement than IMAP) but it seems to be more a query API than a sync API, although there are facilities to "get changes since last time" (a HUGE improvement from IMAP as deployed everywhere). Yes, that's pretty much what I gathered from the heliotrope story, that syncing was a bit of a mess. > OTOH if you can shoehorn it into couchbase-lite, you can use a generic sync protocol that can be used for other things too (caldav/carddav). Exactly. All the hard work done! For free! But seriously, couchdb was born from the ashes of lotus notes, and at least in spirit it was made for this kind of stuff... so couchdb sync, and some kind of half-assed search might be the way to go (on the server, elastic-search would probably work fine... not sure about on something like Android). > Heck, you've piqued my curiosity, I see something doable here. I'd love to hear more. I might even hack something just for fun. Great :-) If you do, please feel free to drop me an email (see profile). [mk] https://github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz [a] https://github.com/pazz/alot
In FastMail app for iOS and Android now available

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.