HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
pcm-dpc
COVID-19
OPEN SOURCE2020–2020
pcm-dpc / COVID-19

COVID-19

COVID-19 Italia - Monitoraggio situazione

6Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

COVID-19 Italia - Monitoraggio situazione

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day7 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-03-08 19:41:40 UTC to 2020-03-24 04:53:35 UTC.

0122020-03-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 82020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-03-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-03-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 162020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 24

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 82020-03-08 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 92020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 102020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 112020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 122020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 132020-03-13 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-14 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 142020-03-14 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-15 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 152020-03-15 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 162020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 172020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 182020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 192020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 202020-03-20 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 212020-03-21 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 222020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC202
Mar 232020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 242020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-25 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

7 sources
As of today they did 275,468 tests: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xAyDSpzEp3n4iiu54_XL... This is a post (sorry, in Italian) that describes the "strategy" adopted to test people, that of course varies by region. tl;dr: in regions like Lombardia (the most affected) they can almost only test people who really show severe signs, therefore the rate is around 38%. https://www.ilpost.it/2020/03/20/tampone-test-coronavirus/ Official data is here: https://github.com/pcm-dpc/COVID-19, I just put it in a spreadsheet for easier consumption. Edit: forgot a link
In Ask HN: How is actually Italy confirming SARS-Cov2 cases?
>Another possibility is that Italy doesn't have a handle on who is or isn't infected so what they report are the obvious infections, who tend to be older. This is very likely the case, as can be seen in the positive test outcome rates. 16.7% in Italy vs. 3.6% in South Korea Italy has run around 60k tests. South Korea are testing around 15k people/day and have tested 234k people in total. They've even setup drive-through testing centers where anyone can drive through, get tested, and get results via SMS in under a day. The result of this is likely a much larger number of asymptomatic or mild cases in the South Korean numbers, which based on the China data, tend to be a lot younger. https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=&bid=0030 https://github.com/pcm-dpc/COVID-19/blob/master/schede-riepi...
In Italy and South Korea virus outbreaks reveal disparity in deaths and tactics

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.