HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
pedronauck
reworm
TypeScript2026–2026
pedronauck / reworm

reworm

🍫 the simplest way to manage state

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

🍫 the simplest way to manage state

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-03-15 17:00:52 UTC to 2026-03-16 07:23:24 UTC.

012026-03-15 17:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-15 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 15, 17:002026-03-15 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-15 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-15 19:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-15 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-15 20:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-15 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-15 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-15 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-03-15 22:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-15 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-15 23:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 16, 00:002026-03-16 01:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-16 02:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-16 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-03-16 04:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-16 05:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-16 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-16 07:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 16, 07:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 15, 17:002026-03-15 17:00:00 UTC2026-03-15 18:00:00 UTC101
Mar 15, 18:002026-03-15 18:00:00 UTC2026-03-15 19:00:00 UTC000
Mar 15, 19:002026-03-15 19:00:00 UTC2026-03-15 20:00:00 UTC000
Mar 15, 20:002026-03-15 20:00:00 UTC2026-03-15 21:00:00 UTC000
Mar 15, 21:002026-03-15 21:00:00 UTC2026-03-15 22:00:00 UTC101
Mar 15, 22:002026-03-15 22:00:00 UTC2026-03-15 23:00:00 UTC000
Mar 15, 23:002026-03-15 23:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 16, 00:002026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 01:00:00 UTC000
Mar 16, 01:002026-03-16 01:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 02:00:00 UTC000
Mar 16, 02:002026-03-16 02:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 03:00:00 UTC000
Mar 16, 03:002026-03-16 03:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 04:00:00 UTC101
Mar 16, 04:002026-03-16 04:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 05:00:00 UTC000
Mar 16, 05:002026-03-16 05:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 06:00:00 UTC000
Mar 16, 06:002026-03-16 06:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 07:00:00 UTC000
Mar 16, 07:002026-03-16 07:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 08:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
I don't quite understand how this is working tbh. I looked at one of the affected repos, ironically named "reworm". The malicious code was introduced in this commit - https://github.com/pedronauck/reworm/commit/d50cd8c8966893c6... It says coauthored by dependabot and refers to a PR opened in 2020 (https://github.com/pedronauck/reworm/pull/28). That PR itself was merged in 2020 here - https://github.com/pedronauck/reworm/commit/df8c1803c519f599... But the commit with the worm (d50cd8c), re-introduces the same change from df8c180 to the file `yarn.lock`. And when you look at the history of yarn.lock inside of github, all references to the original version bump (df8c180) are gone...? In fact if you look at the overall commit history, the clean df8c180 commit does not exist. I'm struggling to understand what kind of shenanigans happened here
Read the rest
exactly.
In Glassworm is back: A new wave of invisible Unicode attacks hits repositories
Looks like the repo owner force-pushed a bad commit to replace an existing one. But then, why not forge it to maintain the existing timestamp + author, e.g. via `git commit --amend -C df8c18`? Innocuous PR (but do note the line about "pedronauck pushed a commit that referenced this pull request last week"): https://github.com/pedronauck/reworm/pull/28 Original commit: https://github.com/pedronauck/reworm/commit/df8c18 Amended commit: https://github.com/pedronauck/reworm/commit/d50cd8 Either way, pretty clear sign that the owner's creds (and possibly an entire machine) are compromised.
In Glassworm is back: A new wave of invisible Unicode attacks hits repositories

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.