HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Peiyang-Song
Awesome-LLM-Reasoning-Failures
AI & Machine Learning2026–2026
Peiyang-Song / Awesome-LLM-Reasoning-Failures

Awesome-LLM-Reasoning-Failures

Repo for "Large Language Model Reasoning Failures"

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
223GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Repo for "Large Language Model Reasoning Failures"

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-02-21 10:50:01 UTC to 2026-03-07 12:38:27 UTC.

012026-02-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 212026-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 282026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 7

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 212026-02-21 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-22 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 222026-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 232026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242026-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 252026-02-25 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 262026-02-26 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 272026-02-27 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 282026-02-28 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 22026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 32026-03-03 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 42026-03-04 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 52026-03-05 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 62026-03-06 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 72026-03-07 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-08 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Papers like these are much needed bucket of ice water. We antropomorphize these systems too much. Skimming through conclusions and results, the authors conclude that LLMs exhibit failures across many axes we'd find to be demonstrative of AGI. Moral reasoning, simple things like counting that a toddler can do, etc. They're just not human and you can reasonably hypothesize most of these failures stem from their nature as next-token predictors that happen to usually do what you want. So. If you've got OpenClaw running and thinking you've got Jarvis from Iron Man, this is probably a good read to ground yourself. Note there's a GitHub repo compiling these failures from the authors: https://github.com/Peiyang-Song/Awesome-LLM-Reasoning-Failur...
In Large Language Model Reasoning Failures

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.