HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
pg-redis-fdw
redis_fdw
C2013–2013
pg-redis-fdw / redis_fdw

redis_fdw

A PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper for Redis

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
534GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper for Redis

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-09-09 19:52:13 UTC to 2013-09-10 16:44:44 UTC.

012013-09-09 19:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-09 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 9, 19:002013-09-09 20:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-09 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-09 21:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-09 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-09 22:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-09 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-09 23:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 01:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 02:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 03:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 04:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 05:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 10, 05:002013-09-10 06:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 07:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 08:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 09:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 10:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 11:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 12:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 13:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 14:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 15:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-10 16:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-10 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 10, 16:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 9, 19:002013-09-09 19:00:00 UTC2013-09-09 20:00:00 UTC101
Sep 9, 20:002013-09-09 20:00:00 UTC2013-09-09 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 9, 21:002013-09-09 21:00:00 UTC2013-09-09 22:00:00 UTC000
Sep 9, 22:002013-09-09 22:00:00 UTC2013-09-09 23:00:00 UTC000
Sep 9, 23:002013-09-09 23:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 00:002013-09-10 00:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 01:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 01:002013-09-10 01:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 02:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 02:002013-09-10 02:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 03:002013-09-10 03:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 04:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 04:002013-09-10 04:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 05:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 05:002013-09-10 05:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 06:002013-09-10 06:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 07:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 07:002013-09-10 07:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 08:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 08:002013-09-10 08:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 09:002013-09-10 09:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 10:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 10:002013-09-10 10:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 11:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 11:002013-09-10 11:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 12:002013-09-10 12:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 13:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 13:002013-09-10 13:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 14:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 14:002013-09-10 14:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 15:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 15:002013-09-10 15:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 16:00:00 UTC000
Sep 10, 16:002013-09-10 16:00:00 UTC2013-09-10 17:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Very cool, and awesome on opensourcing the agentredrabbit code! We had a somewhat simpler but related "tons of data coming in via RESTful services and don't want to flood directly to the db with massive parallel connections" issue and solved it with Redis likewise. Since we used postgres as the backend, we (http://www.ivc.com) actually sponsored a project create a Redis FDW: https://github.com/pg-redis-fdw/redis_fdw so we could batch up 1,000s of inserts into a single database insert, thus reducing IO to disk.
In Scaling with Queues

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.