HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
pgriess
node-msgpack
JavaScript2011–2011
pgriess / node-msgpack · Archived

node-msgpack

A space-efficient object serialization library for NodeJS

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
529GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A space-efficient object serialization library for NodeJS

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:23:53 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-05-22 02:52:03 UTC to 2011-05-22 22:20:10 UTC.

012011-05-22 02:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 22, 02:002011-05-22 03:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 04:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 05:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 07:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 08:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 09:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 10:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 11:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 22, 12:002011-05-22 13:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 14:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 15:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 16:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 17:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 19:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 20:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 21:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-05-22 22:00:00 UTC to 2011-05-22 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 22, 22:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 22, 02:002011-05-22 02:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 03:00:00 UTC101
May 22, 03:002011-05-22 03:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 04:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 04:002011-05-22 04:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 05:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 05:002011-05-22 05:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 06:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 06:002011-05-22 06:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 07:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 07:002011-05-22 07:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 08:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 08:002011-05-22 08:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 09:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 09:002011-05-22 09:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 10:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 10:002011-05-22 10:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 11:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 11:002011-05-22 11:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 12:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 12:002011-05-22 12:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 13:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 13:002011-05-22 13:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 14:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 14:002011-05-22 14:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 15:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 15:002011-05-22 15:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 16:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 16:002011-05-22 16:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 17:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 17:002011-05-22 17:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 18:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 18:002011-05-22 18:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 19:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 19:002011-05-22 19:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 20:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 20:002011-05-22 20:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 21:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 21:002011-05-22 21:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 22:00:00 UTC000
May 22, 22:002011-05-22 22:00:00 UTC2011-05-22 23:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
MessagePack in Node isn't much more than bindings to the C++ library (https://github.com/pgriess/node-msgpack/blob/master/src/msgp...). For me the bottom line was "What's faster in Node, for my project, right now?", and the answer was JSON. There are benefits to MessagePack that have already been mentioned here, namely not having to base64 binary data first (smaller size), but that's true for any binary message format. I'd love to see some other binary formats thrown into the ring and see how they compare to MessagePack in both size efficiency and encode/decode performance. BSON seems like an interesting option, but I don't know enough about it to comment...
In You're Using JSON, Why not MessagePack?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.