HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
pharo-project
pharo
Smalltalk2018–2023
pharo-project / pharo

pharo

Pharo is a dynamic reflective pure object-oriented language supporting live programming inspired by Smalltalk.

5Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Pharo is a dynamic reflective pure object-oriented language supporting live programming inspired by Smalltalk.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-03-09 07:01:12 UTC to 2023-05-13 10:23:09 UTC.

01232018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303

What Hacker News says

6 sources
Look, I spent 5 years trying to work with Pharo. Not a few minutes. Yeah, I don't care about Pharo anymore. At all. That's because of what I've been through with it and its community. So please stop telling me I'm lazy, entitled, or that I "don't care after a few minutes". I've been giving Pharo chances for years - it just never got any better. I'm mentioning Cincom (no affiliation) Visual Works over and over again. If you read it carefully, you'd see that I'm not entirely OK with the restrictive personal license, the lack of any cryptography-related stuff (incl. HTTPS), and the closed source VM. I'd prefer a Smalltalk without these restrictions. I still use VW and not Pharo - because the gap in quality of the software is so incredibly wide that it dwarfs other considerations. VW looks like it's made by professionals (well paid at that).
Read the rest
Pharo looks anything but, yet (politely, out of concern and genuine interest) pointing it out gets you hate and verbal violence from the community. I want an open source Smalltalk implementation. I want more people to like Smalltalk. I want more people to use Smalltalk. Pharo could be helpful with these, but it's not. Instead of a gateway into Smalltalk ecosystem, Pharo is an impenetrable wall to new users. And the community doesn't care. There are some people that do care. See Glamorous Toolkit. See Cuis. I wrote a few small pet projects in Pharo, back in 2012. They kept getting broken release after release. And at some point, the default download with official releases stopped working altogether. And never worked again. There's a ticket from 2021 (created years after it stopped working for me) describing the problem: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/9729 This is a regression brought about due to another rewrite of something. Still not fixed. You know, I could fix myself and contribute the fix - I have the skills and could potentially find the time. But Pharo and its community burned so many bridges for me that this is not going to happen. Call me petty all you want, but the kinds of people running Pharo are just not worth being helped.
In Pharo 11
> the actual implementation in the `MethodFinder` class. I don't know enough Smalltalk to decipher it :( For reference, here is the relevant class: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/blob/9ad3324bf8aff11e... A core snippet is: foundPermutationSends := (receiver class allSelectorsToTestInMethodFinderWithArity: inputCollection size - 1) collect: [ :method | MethodFinderSend receiver: receiver deepCopy selector: method withArguments: args deepCopy ]. This means, roughly: - ask the receiver class (in the example above, the class of 2, which is something like SmallInteger) for "all the selectors (= method names) to test" with the given number of arguments. - for each of these methods, build a MethodFinderSend object, which is at this point is just a container holding a copy of the receiver object, the method to call on it,
Read the rest
and a copy of the arguments to test with Then, given this collection of MethodFinderSend objects: ^ (self possibleSolutionsForInput: inputCollection) select: [ :send | send resultIn: expectedResult ]. This means: - execute the "resultIn:" method on each of the MethodFinderSend and return a collection of those where this returns true The implementation of this "resultIn:" method is in https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/blob/c896913a00fa6e2b...: [ [ ^ expectedResult = (receiver perform: selector withArguments: arguments) ] onErrorDo: [ :anError | ^ false ] ] on: Deprecation do: [ :depr | ^ false ] This is, roughly: - try to perform the call - return false if there is an exception - otherwise, return true or false depending on whether the result equals the expected result So yes, it's an exhaustive search over the methods that the receiver's class promises are OK to test. If you write a method that tries to format the hard drive, and your class exports this method in its "selectors to test", then searching for a method on this class will attempt to format your hard drive.
In Pharo Smalltalk Overview

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.