glass

Hello Ramraj, I am Dev, an incoming SWE in the Quant Desk team at Goldman Sachs and I wanted to reach out, if you are open to hiring applicants for the Applied AI Engineering roles at Komodo Health! I loved Komodo’s mission of reducing the global burden of disease and your AI-first approach, and had messaged you with my application on Reddit! About me: I am a prev:SWE Intern at AWS India(was extended return offer), in the Q for Business Team, where I work on integration of BidirectionalStreaming using TTS models to integrate low latency voice mode usage in our application; and an active contributor to Pickle's Glass[ https://github.com/pickle-com/glass ], and HyprNote[ https://www.linkedin.com/company/hyprnote/ ]. My previous experiences include: Experience: WorldQuant (Quant Research), AstraZeneca (ML engineer for drug discovery using LL

Some shady stuff. They seem to have "re-created" the main branch, and force pushed an "Initial Commit" with GPLv3.... https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commits/main/ Maybe they don't know that the history is still there? https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/activity?ref=main https://web.archive.org/web/20250704222510/https://github.co...

> looks like they fixed it: https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commit/5c462179acface889... Not fixed, covered up. > let's not freak out - you can't "steal" open-source code, they used an incompatible license. that was accidentally too free. What a poetic formulation? In reality, they deleted history and they put a license that allows the "freedom" to let them monetize the code. I wonder how's the original author more free with this license? How is anyone more free? Sounds like the license was "accidentally" "too free" in a way that only made themselves more free. > people monetizing something you open-source isn't stealing. It's, in fact, the precise definition when the open-source project uses the GPLv3 license.

Hiding the entire history of this incident[1] behind a force push[2] to make it seem as if credit was given and proper license was chosen from the start really displays a lack of integrity, and tells me it’s definitely malicious (which should be quite clear from zero mention of the original project to begin with, but this act reinforces that) rather an inadvertent screwup. [1] https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commits/5c462179acface88... [2] https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commit/4c51d5133c4987fa1...

You restored the license to GPL v3: https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commit/5c462179acface889... You won't be forgiven unless you credited sohzm and state that cheating-daddy is a direct inspiration

looks like they fixed it: https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commit/5c462179acface889... let's not freak out - you can't "steal" open-source code, they used an incompatible license. that was accidentally too free. people monetizing something you open-source isn't stealing.

They committed the (presumably ripped off) repo yesterday, changed the license from GPL to Apache, and now have changed it back (presumably in response to this thread). https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commits/main/LICENSE

11 minutes ago "licensed fixed" https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commit/5c462179acface889...

yeah he changed it rn https://github.com/pickle-com/glass/commit/5c462179acface889...

Maybe I’m looking at the wrong repos but both appear to be GPL-3 (or maybe it was relicensed back to original GPL-3?) https://github.com/sohzm/cheating-daddy https://github.com/pickle-com/glass