HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
pipes-digital
pipes
JavaScript2017–2026
pipes-digital / pipes

pipes

Repository for Pipes

5Distinct people
10Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
282GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Repository for Pipes

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year10 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-06-13 22:18:54 UTC to 2026-02-12 11:28:46 UTC.

012342017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

10 sources
Great stuff :) That's exactly what I meant :thumbsup: I actually found www.pipes.digital in my mind map with a comment to the effect that it's a Yahoo! pipes replacement - so I come across it a year ago in fact. I'm sticking to Node-RED simply because that's what I know - also its open source and very extendable, so that's why its my cup of tea. EDIT: Pipes is also open source --> https://github.com/pipes-digital/pipes --> sorry didn't see that.
In Blog Feeds
When Pipes died I saw all the comments and wondered why no one built a successor project. When after a few years that still hadn't happened, and after an idea on how to get it to work had popped into my head, I built it myself: https://github.com/pipes-digital/pipes is the source code and https://www.pipes.digital/ a hosted version. To call it a successor project is maybe arrogant and misleading - it can not do half of what the Yahoo project did, and is sorely missing time and work from my side to make it into what it should be. But if you are nostalgic for the concept and especially if you just want to filter or combine a few RSS feeds, or create one for a HTML page that is missing one, it's worth a try I still think. I personally use it regularly to get specific YouTube videos from a few channels that have many other videos I do not car
Read the rest
e about. The article mentions one of the big problems for this kind of project: The APIs are missing or not open anymore. For example, a comment here mentions doing a google search for a song title and putting this in a feed - but you can't realistically parse Google. So you have to use the API, which I didn't know existed until looking it up now, and calculate the price tag attached to it very carefully. Maybe it would be a realistic integration to provide with a different search engine. Or a bigger project should run of the local search engines for the pipes block. The article is also right in that there is a lot of influence of Pipes in different projects. I was always wondering why that influence was often so little - to react to output on a page in a wizard for example, instead of having blocks. I think I understand that a little bit better now - it is really a strange abstraction level. You are working with a flow of structured data, without necessarily having the correct data structure for that, and then that needs to be transformed somehow. The idea that you might have JSON on a page somewhere you want to extract and manipulate, but then that data is inside of your outer feed format - it feels wrong to confront the user with these details, it makes sure the target groups is developers, but it also does not seem like something that can be reasonably universally solved. But maybe I'm wrong here, and this is more a problem with my implementation (where RSS is piped from block to block) than with the concept itself. The idea of a real Pipes 2 is very exciting to me though. Give it some initial funding, built all of the modern APIs into it that can be added (and in doubt just give users the option to use their own API keys) - especially things like ChatGPT, after all those LLMs are great in converting structured data - solve the data format question and crucially keep the interface block based (but maybe built with something like Flutter, so it can be better). Could work, not to win the world, but as something that can justify its existence next to ifttt and zapier. At least I regularly get the impression that the concept still fascinates people a lot, though their specific use case is very often very specialized and then often enough not something my small pipes project can cover. But if it were broader...
In Pipe Dreams: The life and times of Yahoo Pipes
Great writeup, especially with all the workflow canvas screenshots. Makes me want to try out Node-RED. From a few weeks ago on HN: https://github.com/pipes-digital/pipes “pipes.digital is a spiritual successor to Yahoo Pipes, a graphical interface to get data from the web and to manipulate it by connecting block” These look like great tools. I think calling these low-code / no-code frameworks is however quite misleading though, because there is actually code, it’s just inside the component! Code still has to be written. One thing that these low-code / no-code frameworks do well is provide a structure that you can easily show visually. This is particularity useful when you have to work with clients that aren’t that technical. It makes creating specifications much easier, which can be reviewed and revised before embarking on a big developme
Read the rest
nt effort.
In Building My Own Yahoo Pipes
> A Yahoo pipes! clone really needs some open source love. Too bad the maintainer is more interested in making it a one man SaaS. I guess that's fair. I want(ed) to run Pipes as an SaaS because I think that model would be highly advantageous to me, and that would be very advantageous for Pipes. But that with the predecessors history as background this approach is a critical concern is something I do understand. I will now try to have my cake and eat it too: https://github.com/pipes-digital/pipes contains a new FOSS version that is meant to exist in parallel with pipes.digital, as long as that model works out. So worst case now is this FOSS approach fails, and then only the SaaS would die, not the software.
In This Video Has X Views
Thanks :) I now understand the issue with the red portion and the [x]. That will be fixed soon. For the page, there was a bug with get params, those killed the output inspector. I fixed those now, it should be better able to fetch pages like http://www.plndr.com/product/browse?a=34714&catId=0&version=.... I was able to extract the product names from there in an example page, just a download block and an extract block selecting `.product-cell .product-title`. If you still have problems, would you please comment again, open a bug on https://github.com/pipes-digital/pipes/issues or send me a mail? Kind of crucial to iron the kinks out. The parse errors are annoying, but I failed silencing them so far. The XML parser is throwing them regardless of try-catch, I don't know why. But they will be just ignored later on: 'View output' should show t
Read the rest
he pure html (instead of parsed and highlighted XML) instead. That seemed to work fine so far (but might fail in a different browser than those tested...).
In Show HN: Early-stage Yahoo Pipes spiritual successor

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.