HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
plausible
analytics
Elixir2020–2026
plausible / analytics

analytics

Open source, privacy-first web analytics. Lightweight, cookie-free Google Analytics alternative. Self-hosted or cloud.

44Distinct people
55Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
29.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Open source, privacy-first web analytics. Lightweight, cookie-free Google Analytics alternative. Self-hosted or cloud.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:59:53 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year55 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-04-08 16:54:49 UTC to 2026-08-16 08:59:42 UTC.

0510152020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 1 submissions, 16 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 2 submissions, 7 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17116
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC927
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321

What Hacker News says

17 sources
Sure, our main repository comes with a production-ready Dockerfile: https://github.com/plausible/analytics We also have a separate repository with examples and code for how to host Plausible Analytics with docker-compose: https://github.com/plausible/hosting The hosting repo includes everything you need including databases, MaxMind GeoIP database, reverse proxy for SSL, etc. We don't host with docker-compose ourselves because we want to scale our databases independently from the app server. I'm not sure I understand your question. Secrets should never be committed to source control, whether the repo is public or not. Being open source does not change how we manage secrets in the slightest. Does that answer your question?
In Lessons from building and growing an open source SaaS
Thanks for clearing this up. The general data points and metrics we store are not personal data. IP address is the only piece of data that we touch that is considered PII under some regulations including GDPR. The IP address is fully anonymized by hashing it together with a daily changing salt. Old salts are deleted to as to prevent re-identification: https://github.com/plausible/analytics/blob/master/lib/plaus... According to GDPR Recital 26, anonymized data does not fall within the GDPR at all because data is no longer considered “personal data” following anonymization: > The principles of data protection should therefore not apply to anonymous information, namely information which does not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person or to personal data rendered anonymous in such a manner that the data subject is not or no lo
Read the rest
nger identifiable.
In Plausible Analytics Isn't GDPR Compliant
Plausible was not built to be a clone or a full on feature by feature replacement. It is an alternative that works for many people who think GA is complicated, slow, privacy intrusive and so on. We do try to add what we believe are 20% of GA features that 80% of GA users need without adding too much complexity. We already do support event / goal tracking and we have metadata for goals as the next big feature on our public roadmap: https://github.com/plausible/analytics/projects/1
In Show HN: Plausible – Self-Hosted Google Analytics alternative
Plausible Analytics [1] is an MIT Licensed alternative to Google Analytics. It is hosted at plausible.io but can also be self-hosted. The app server is written in Phoenix/Elixir. The self-hosted version is distributed as a Docker image. It is configured [2] with a PostgreSQL server for user data, a Clickhouse server for analytics data, and an SMTP server for transactional email. EDIT: according to markosaric, the data policy restricts the granularity of Active Users [3] to daily statistics for privacy reasons so the common Monthly Active Users (MAU) stat is not available. [1] https://github.com/plausible/analytics [2] https://docs.plausible.io/self-hosting-configuration [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_users
In Show HN: Plausible – Self-Hosted Google Analytics alternative
I noticed that Plausible claims to measure traffic without being able to persistently identify users, but https://plausible.io/data-policy states that they store the following: hash(daily_salt + website_domain + ip_address + user_agent) There are optimizations that can help brute-force the enumeration of customer domains, browser UAs, and IP addresses (e.g. in some cases you could enumerate only residential ISPs). Update: I mis-interpreted "rotating salt" to mean something that could be re-computed on Plausible's backend. It appears that the salt is random[1] and generated on the client-side, which makes this hash much more secure. 1. https://github.com/plausible/analytics/blob/master/lib/plaus...
In How to pay your rent with your open source project
You claim that using your analytics doesn't require user consent: > "Plausible does not use cookies and does not collect any personal data. This makes us compliant with the different cookie laws and privacy regulations. It means that you are not required to annoy your visitors with a cookie notice if you’re using Plausible analytics." [1] > "Compliant with privacy regulations: Google Analytics places cookies and collects a lot of data from your visitors. You’re required to have a privacy policy, to show a cookie banner and to obtain consent for GDPR. Plausible Analytics doesn’t use cookies and doesn’t track personal data so you don’t need to annoy your visitors or worry about those prompts." [2] It would seem you are collecting PII and processing it server side (?), e.g. calculate_fingerprint here [3]. Care to explain how that doesn't req
Read the rest
In Tiny websites are great
There are also "tiny" solutions for analytics. I'm working on Plausible Analytics which is only 1.4 KB right now and provides a modern dashboard. It also doesn't use cookies and doesn't collect personal data so you're not required to show the cookie/GDPR prompts which would make tiny websites much less tiny. See https://plausible.io/ There's an issue on our Github which will help us perhaps reduce it to under 1 KB too. We're working on that https://github.com/plausible-insights/plausible/issues
In Tiny websites are great
I'm working on an open-source web analytics tool over at https://github.com/plausible-insights/plausible. It's currently bringing in $800/mo and growing pretty fast. The code is all MIT license and we're working to make it easier to self-host. I make money through providing a hosted version of the product. It's a similar model to Sentry or Gitlab. Open-source does not have to be libraries and frameworks, there are good opportunities to build more traditional SaaS products that can be self-hosted and you can make money by selling a hosted version. I understand that not all open-source projects can be funded this way. Once I can pay my own salary, I'm planning to set aside a percentage of revenue to fund open-source projects that Plausible itself relies on.
In Ask HN: Dear open source devs how do you sustain yourself

Showing the 15 most recent of 17 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.