HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
podman-container-tools
podman
Go2018–2026
podman-container-tools / podman

podman

Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.

112Distinct people
140Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
33.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 12:45:45 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year140 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-02-23 19:14:17 UTC to 2026-10-23 18:05:58 UTC.

01020302018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 0 submissions, 13 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 23 mentions; 2 submissions, 21 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 18 mentions; 2 submissions, 16 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 26 mentions; 9 submissions, 17 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 2 submissions, 8 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 23 mentions; 0 submissions, 23 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 14 mentions; 0 submissions, 14 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC13013
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC826
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC23221
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC18216
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC26917
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1028
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC23023
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC14014

What Hacker News says

18 sources
> Maybe I just missed an obvious route to disable swaths of SELinux for rootless containers - where it probably doesn't have as much of an application. podman run --security-opt label=disable https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/troubleshooti... Note: Labeling can be disabled for all containers by setting label=false in the containers.conf(5) file. https://docs.podman.io/en/latest/markdown/podman-run.1.html#... But more secure way would be to add ":z" or ":Z" to volume and podman will auto-relabel source dir. Finally you can use nuclear option: "--privileged". It's still more secure than docker's one because you are limited by your user's capabilities.
In Podman Desktop: A Free OSS Alternative to Docker Desktop
I like this Podman feature: Socket activation of containers Advantages: - Faster network. Rootless Podman will run with native network speed. Normally rootless Podman runs with reduced network speed due to the performance penalty that comes from using slirp4netns. - Improved security as you can disable the ability to establish outgoing connections with --network=none. The container can still communicate over the socket-activated socket with a client that has connected via the internet. I contributed a Podman socket activation tutorial: https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/docs/tutorial... and I wrote two blogs about the security adva
Read the rest
ntages https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/socket-activation-podman https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/podman-systemd-limit-access Docker does not support socket activation of containers. (Docker only supports socket activation of the Docker daemon) Edit: A clarification about the network speed. The improved speed is about the communication that passes over the socket-activated socket. This communication does not pass through slirp4netns so it has the same performance characteristics as the normal network on the host.
In Podman 4.2.0
> I was looking at this just last night and the story with Ubuntu is horrible. That's essentially going to be stuck on v3.4 for ten years because it's "a lot of work" to get into that distribution. They used to provide relatively recent builds in their kubic repos. Unfortunately, for some reason, they decided to discontinue it[0]. They mentioned some CVEs or something in some issues raised around this, but to me that means pushing a new version/build and not discontinuing it. Anyway, one of the members of the Containers org provides unstable kubic repos[1][2] for non RH systems. Unfortunately, this includes RCs, and non-stable versions, which is fine to get bleeding edge, but I'd rather just have the stable versions. Due to the above, I've written some scripts to build deb packages for all the latest stable versions. So hopefully you can
Read the rest
In Podman 4.2.0
The --uidmap and --gidmap options can map your regular user on the host to any specific user inside the container. These options may look to be a bit complicated to use, but as soon as you understand how rootless Podman maps UIDs and GIDs it will be pretty straight forward. I wrote two troubleshooting tips about how to use them: https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/troubleshooti... https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/troubleshooti...
In Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
This release features - First binary for Windows, all due to amazing work of podman team - https://github.com/containers/podman/releases/tag/v4.0.3 - First test flatpak image - Binaries for ARM - On Linux, easily switching between native podman and podman machine based setups - Easily identify where settings are stored - Debug panel and log level control to know everything that is happening - Optimization of settings screen - Toggle for automatically starting the podman service
In Podman Desktop Companion GUI – Parity on All Major Operating Systems
That's a valid question. I also did not look up until you asked. Check this out[1] > One of the guiding factors on networking for containers with Podman is going to be whether or not the container is run by a root user or not. This is because unprivileged users cannot create networking interfaces on the host. Therefore, with rootfull containers, the default networking mode is to use netavark. For rootless, the default network mode is slirp4netns. Because of the limited privileges, slirp4netns lacks some of the features of networking; for example, slirp4netns cannot give containers a routable IP address. [1]: https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/docs/tutorial...
In Podman 4.0

Showing the 15 most recent of 18 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.