HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Polymer
pwa-starter-kit
JavaScript2018–2018
Polymer / pwa-starter-kit · Archived

pwa-starter-kit

Starter templates for building full-featured Progressive Web Apps from web components.

2Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Starter templates for building full-featured Progressive Web Apps from web components.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-06-02 03:23:17 UTC to 2018-09-24 16:25:40 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122018-05-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 282018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2018-06-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 232018-07-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-08-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-08-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-08-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-08-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-09-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-09-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-09-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-09-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 24

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 282018-05-28 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 42018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 112018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-18 00:00:00 UTC202
Jun 182018-06-18 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 252018-06-25 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 22018-07-02 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 92018-07-09 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 162018-07-16 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 232018-07-23 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 302018-07-30 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 62018-08-06 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 132018-08-13 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 202018-08-20 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 272018-08-27 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 32018-09-03 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 102018-09-10 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 172018-09-17 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 242018-09-24 00:00:00 UTC2018-10-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Absolutely, because it just looks more like HTML. It becomes much more apparent as you have attributes, larger static sections of templates, and styles. Check out this app component in PWA Starter Kit: https://github.com/Polymer/pwa-starter-kit/blob/master/src/c... Or the template from the js-framework-benchmarks: https://github.com/krausest/js-framework-benchmark/blob/mast... Or the template from one of the wired-elements: https://github.com/wiredjs/wired-elements/blob/master/packag... Given HTML-specific syntax-highlighting and large templates, I really think the HTML format is easier to read.
In Show HN: Thi.ng/hdom – S-expression based, pure ES6 UI/VDOM components
I'm still super gung-ho about web components. The progressive browsers are committed to making it happen. The picture is not so bleak for custom elements: https://caniuse.com/#feat=custom-elementsv1 Firefox also just announced that Shadow DOM arrived in a nightly: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1460069 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17172613 Contrary to popular belief, you can start using web components WITH just custom elements and WITHOUT shadow DOM! https://twitter.com/rob_dodson/status/961780022628331520 I jumped onto this bandwagon early and struggled with Polymer 2 and HTML imports (ugh!). Now they have made the same realizations and moving forward LitElement will lead the charge toward usable and lightweight web components: https://www.polymer-project.org/blog/2018-05-02-roadmap-upda... https://github.com/Polyme
Read the rest
r/lit-element Here's how you can get started: https://github.com/Polymer/pwa-starter-kit/wiki It's not paradise, there are kinks to work out, but ultimately one can make production worthy apps with web components TODAY (polyfills available). You can sleep at night not worrying that your library will become the new jQuery someday: https://twitter.com/SaraSoueidan/status/999645120155746304
In Web Code is a solved Problem – how about fixing Web UI next?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.