Pontoon

> Open source: Pontoon is free to use by anyone And yet, the top level license file contains two licenses, a goddamn if statement, and finally a default to Elastic License which is not open source Then, because if this trickery, lawyers get to make good money because does "2. LICENSE file in the same directory as the work" combined with "4. Defaults to Elastic License 2.0 (ELv2)" mean that this zero byte file NAMED LICENSE but devoid of any content match clause 2 or 4? https://github.com/pontoon-data/Pontoon/blob/v0.2.0/data-tra... I hate cutesy licenses with all my heart. Just say you want to use Elastic, drop the Open Source pretense, and go back to selling software instead of trying to position yourself as "open" No educated person is going to give you free commits in the current state so no need to be opaque in hopes of tricking them