HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
powturbo
TurboPFor-Integer-Compression
C2014–2023
powturbo / TurboPFor-Integer-Compression

TurboPFor-Integer-Compression

Fastest Integer Compression

2Distinct people
18Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
851GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Fastest Integer Compression

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-10-29 12:03:06 UTC to 2023-06-25 09:29:43 UTC.

02462014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 3 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 2 submissions, 4 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 2 submissions, 4 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC431
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC624
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC624

What Hacker News says

18 sources
Gorilla [1] and Gorilla based algos [2] are simply overrated. Store these values as 32 bits floats instead of 64 bits and you get instant 50% reduction without any compression. This is valid for allmost all time series data. Most of time series databases (ex. DuckDB) are storing floating point data as 64 bits. They are reporting some extraordinary compression ratio by using a gorilla/chimp like algorithm. However as shown in this benchmark, lot of time series data (ex. temparature, climate data, stocks,...) don't have more than 1 or 2 fixed decimal digits and can be stored losslessly in 16/32 bits integers. Integer compression [1] algorithms can then be used, which results in significant compression ratio and several times faster than the gorilla like algorithms. TurboGorilla, the fastest Gorilla (or chimp) based algo in c, cannot exceed
Read the rest
1GB/s in decompression, wherea TurboPFor is in the order of 10Gb/s, TurboBitByte is >100Gb/s. -[1] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression -[2] https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol8/p1816-teller.pdf -[3] https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol15/p3058-liakos.pdf
In Show HN: Time Series Benchmark TurboPFor,TurboFloat,TurboFloat LzX,TurboGorilla
I've some remarks regarding the tests and the test data in this survey. - The data used in the benchmark seems very compressible. However floating point data (also time series) is in general not well losslessly compressible and the Gorilla algorithm is not helping so much. - TurboPFor Integer Compression [1] has also an improved and faster Gorilla algorithm TurboGorilla (not shown in the benchmark) - TurboPFor has now a new lz based algorithm "TurboFloat LzX" witch drastically compress time series floating point data (up to 3 times). - TurboPFor supports lossy compression [2] (TurboRazor) with a point wise relative error bound. The preprocessed data can be further compressed with any floating point compression algorithm. - TurboPFor supports floating point conversion to integers. The result data can be compressed with any integer compress
Read the rest
ion algorithm. You can test all this functionality with icapp, a TurboPFor benchmark app. Download the excutable for windows + linux from [3] See also the time series floating point benchmark [4] "TurboFor: Time Series" showing different szenarios, using 32-bits instead of 64-bits floating point data like in the benchmark above. [1] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression [2] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression/is... [3] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression/re... [4] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression/is...
In Show HN:The Gorilla in the Room:Exploring RedisTimeSeries Optimizations
Excellent blog post serie about floating point compression. All those (lossless+lossy) floating point compression algos including 1D/2D/3D SIMD transpose with integrated xor and zigzag delta are available in the TurboPFor [1] Integer Compession package. There is a benchmark with the same dataset available in [2] with a comparison to zfp and blosc with the new bytedelta. TurboPFor functions compress/decompress faster with better compression. The bytedelta described in the blog is suboptimal and might not work with other datasets. Download icapp from [3] and make your own tests with your data. [1] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression [2] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression/is... [3] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboPFor-Integer-Compression/re...
In Float Compression 9: Lzsse and Lizard
powturbo·Jun 16, 2015Submission

TurboPFor: Bringing Fastest Integer Compression Incl. SIMD to Java

- Direct Access w/o decompression - Fastest Variable Byte implementation - Novel Variable Simple faster than simple16, better than simple8-b - Scalar Bit Packing decoding as fast as SIMD-Packing - Bit Packing incl. Direct Access/Update w/ zero decompression - Fastest and most efficient SIMD Bit Packing - Fastest SIMD-Elias Fano implementation - Novel TurboPFor (PFor/PForDelta) with direct access or bulk decoding. More efficient than ANY other "integer compression" scheme. - Java Critical Native Interface. Access TurboPFor incl. SIMD from Java as fast as calling from C. ----------------------------------------------------------- * Inverted Index + Intersections - Novel Intersections w/ skip intervals, decompress the min. #blocks - 2000! queries /sec on GOV2 (25 MB docid) on a SINGLE core - Parallel Query Processing on Multicores. 7000! que
Read the rest
ries/sec, quad core CPU
2 points · Open discussion

Showing the 15 most recent of 18 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.