HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
prettydiff
biddle
JavaScript2016–2018
prettydiff / biddle

biddle

Self-hosted application distribution

ProductivityDeveloper ToolsSelf-hosted
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
5Distinct people
13Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
65GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Self-hosted application distribution

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-07-29 19:00:23 UTC to 2018-07-12 13:51:43 UTC.

01232016-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsJul 20162016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 20172017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 20162016-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Aug 20162016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20162016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20162016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC312
Nov 20162016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Dec 20162016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jan 20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 20172017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Mar 20172017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20172017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20172017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20172017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20172017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20172017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20172017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20172017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Nov 20172017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20172017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20182018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20182018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20182018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20182018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20182018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
mordocai·Jul 29, 2016
> * All current package managers are either language or OS specific. What if you have an application with code written in multiple languages? guix and nix both work cross-language and cross-distro. Still OS specific though since only linux AFAIK. Also, containers partially solve this problem. > * NPM didn't have any kind of integrity checks for its packages, and I assume most package managers don't either. If you download a corrupt package, for example, you won't have any idea and it will still install. Any package manager that doesn't do integrity checks is a bad package manager. The only one I know of currently that doesn't is npm, but I haven't looked deeply into every available package manager. > * A lot of package managers seem to intermix packaging, distribution, and a registry. The registries tend to have limited names to pick fro
Read the rest
m (like real estate) and can result in legal problems. Also if registration to the service catalog is required you cannot self-host or self-manage the distribution of your application. What package managers don't let you self host? I'm truthfully not aware of any. Even NPM does according to a quick google. > I am trying to work on a solution to these problems at https://github.com/prettydiff/biddle From your readme: "biddle is inspired by the incredible awesomeness of NPM". Since NPM is literally the worst package manager I have ever used, that line makes me want to stop reading and never touch biddle. I'd word it differently. Edit: Reading biddle further. Dependency management and central hosting are some of the primary reasons to have a package manager. At least for me, that kills any interest at all. I imagine there's a niche market though?
In Comparison of Programming Language Package Managers
anonymousguy·Jul 29, 2016
Since I had starting looking for an alternative to NPM I have discovered a couple of things: * All current package managers are either language or OS specific. What if you have an application with code written in multiple languages? * NPM didn't have any kind of integrity checks for its packages, and I assume most package managers don't either. If you download a corrupt package, for example, you won't have any idea and it will still install. * Some package managers do better than others with regards to managing packages. I found NPM encourages dependency hell and very little management tools for dependent or installed packages. * A lot of package managers seem to intermix packaging, distribution, and a registry. The registries tend to have limited names to pick from (like real estate) and can result in legal problems. Also if registr
Read the rest
ation to the service catalog is required you cannot self-host or self-manage the distribution of your application. I am trying to work on a solution to these problems at https://github.com/prettydiff/biddle
In Comparison of Programming Language Package Managers

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.