HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
prometheus-ar
vot.ar
JavaScript2015–2015
prometheus-ar / vot.ar

vot.ar

VOT.AR - Sistema de Voto Electrónico

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
148GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

VOT.AR - Sistema de Voto Electrónico

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-06-20 01:00:03 UTC to 2015-06-22 16:01:23 UTC.

012015-06-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-20 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 20, 00:002015-06-20 03:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-20 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-20 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-20 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-20 09:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-20 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-20 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-20 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-20 15:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-20 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-20 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-20 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-06-20 21:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-21 03:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-21 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 21, 06:002015-06-21 09:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-21 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-21 15:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-21 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-21 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-21 21:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-22 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-22 03:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-22 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-22 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-22 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-22 09:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-22 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-22 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-22 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-22 15:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-22 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 22, 15:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 20, 00:002015-06-20 00:00:00 UTC2015-06-20 03:00:00 UTC110
Jun 20, 03:002015-06-20 03:00:00 UTC2015-06-20 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 06:002015-06-20 06:00:00 UTC2015-06-20 09:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 09:002015-06-20 09:00:00 UTC2015-06-20 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 12:002015-06-20 12:00:00 UTC2015-06-20 15:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 15:002015-06-20 15:00:00 UTC2015-06-20 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 18:002015-06-20 18:00:00 UTC2015-06-20 21:00:00 UTC101
Jun 20, 21:002015-06-20 21:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 00:002015-06-21 00:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 03:002015-06-21 03:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 06:002015-06-21 06:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 09:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 09:002015-06-21 09:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 12:002015-06-21 12:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 15:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 15:002015-06-21 15:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 18:002015-06-21 18:00:00 UTC2015-06-21 21:00:00 UTC000
Jun 21, 21:002015-06-21 21:00:00 UTC2015-06-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22, 00:002015-06-22 00:00:00 UTC2015-06-22 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22, 03:002015-06-22 03:00:00 UTC2015-06-22 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22, 06:002015-06-22 06:00:00 UTC2015-06-22 09:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22, 09:002015-06-22 09:00:00 UTC2015-06-22 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22, 12:002015-06-22 12:00:00 UTC2015-06-22 15:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22, 15:002015-06-22 15:00:00 UTC2015-06-22 18:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
>Which sites? The tech login sites. >They use SHA256, not MD5 https://github.com/prometheus-ar/vot.ar/blob/master/msa/voto... >double SSL Come on... >hard to read because of the quality of the print print them bigger? change the printer? this makes no sense, unless you want to have the ability to change the vote. It's the only logical explanation. >I guess you are referring to the unencrypted chip data. No, I'm referring, for example, to software package signatures. >No, they can't. It's a physical process This is simply not true. Even if you had the power to physically burn something in the chip (you do not), many RFID chips allow unblocking with a special password, because they do not really burn anything. You don't know how the rfid chip works internally because the design is not public, and there are no ways to check the model of chip
Read the rest
used. > Even people opposing the system had tried Who? were they qualified RF engineers or just some dudes with a commercial RFID reader? No signal can be "absorbed" completely.
In Argentina's voting machine system leaked?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.