prunt

ll sorts of odd hardware: https://github.com/Prunt3D/prunt/blob/6a9dbd0a8d5edd890e4b72... There is also an example of a very trivial implementation here that just dumps commanded positions to stdout which can be used as a starting point: https://github.com/Prunt3D/prunt_simulator/blob/master/src/p... > especially since it sounds like the first-class hardware will eventually be much more than $100 The BOM cost is over $100, so this will be the case, however I would like to try and keep the price well under $200 for something similar to the current hardware. > Adjustable acceleration is already an option on most systems, does editing jerk/snap/crackle actually improve my print quality or just give me more parameters to fiddle with? In my testing I have seen less resonance artefacts with higher order limits as opposed to just limiting acceleration, however I have not done extensive comparisons to other options such as input shaping. > Safter/faster homing seems like a niche issue- I have never had any homing issues, and how much time do I actually save if I crank the speed up? A few seconds per print? The main issue we're solving here is guaranteeing that the switch will never move out of its allowable range when other parameters such as acceleration are changed. For most people the benefit here is likely just never having to think about what number they should put in for homing velocity.