HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
psf
requests
Python2017–2026
psf / requests

requests

A simple, yet elegant, HTTP library.

49Distinct people
55Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
54.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A simple, yet elegant, HTTP library.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 11:34:28 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year55 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-08-14 12:47:34 UTC to 2026-09-21 15:42:58 UTC.

02468102017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC422
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404

What Hacker News says

4 sources
The headline changes in this release are related to the Python plugin host: - Upgraded Python 3.8 to Python 3.14 - Python 3.3 is now disabled by default By default, Sublime plugins now all run under the Python 3.14. The 3.8 plugin host was removed (Python 3.8 reached EOL in Oct 2024), and the 3.3 plugin host is deprecated, and will be removed in a future release. This is great for plugin devs. They get improvements to syntax, performance, type hints, the standard library, etc, and they can depend on modern versions of Python packages. Many packages no longer receive updates for 3.8 (e.g. https://github.com/psf/requests), let alone 3.3, and many others simply don't run on these older python versions (e.g. https://github.com/xberg-io/tree-sitter-language-pack). Like the plugin systems for Emacs/Neovim/VS Code (and unlike the sandboxed syste
Read the rest
ms for e.g. Zed and Helix), Sublime's plugin API has low-level access to the editor, and the runtime has full OS access. I think Sublime was smart to bet on Python for the plugin system. They released the plugin system in 2009, before Python was everywhere. The super flexible plugin API and the huge package ecosystem is a powerful combo.
In Sublime Text Build 4213
thankfully more and more projects are supporting the "standard" SSL_CERT_DIR/SSL_CERT_FILE environment variables [1] i think requests is a tricky one, as it _should_ be supporting it already based on the PR [2], but looks like it was merged in the 3.x branch and idk where that is, release-wise. there is also native TLS on linux (idk what exactly you call it); but cp cert.pem /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/cert.pem && update-ca-certificates all languages also seem to have packages around providing cert bundles which get used directly (e.g., certifi [3]), which does cause some pain [1] https://github.com/rustls/rustls-native-certs/issues/16#issu... [2] https://github.com/psf/requests/issues/2899 [3] https://pypi.org/project/certifi/
In Some secret management belongs in your HTTP proxy
Python’s urllib2 (now urllib.request) started out in the year 2000 [0]. .NET’s WebRequest was available in .NET Framework 1.1 in 2003 [1]. But since then, Microsoft noticed the issues with WebRequest and came up with HttpClient in 2012. It has some issues and footguns, like those related to HttpClient lifetime, but it’s a solid library. On the other hand, the requests library for Python started in 2011 [2], but the stdlib library hasn’t seen many improvements. [0] https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/6d7e47b8ea1b8cf82927d... [1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.webr... [2] https://github.com/psf/requests/blob/main/HISTORY.md#001-201...
In Why I forked httpx
At a very quick look, no evidence is given that the "bugs" found in requests are in fact reachable, i.e. not prevented by construction. And sure enough, the very first one is impossible because of a validating guard[1]: `address_in_network` only gets called after `is_valid_cidr`, which enforces the presence of a slash. I think we should hold claims about effective static analysis and/or program verification to a higher standard than this. [1]: https://github.com/psf/requests/blob/4bd79e397304d46dfccd76f...
In How to train your program verifier

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.