HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ptitSeb
box64
C2021–2025
ptitSeb / box64

box64

Box64 - Linux Userspace x86_64 Emulator with a twist, targeted at ARM64, RV64 and LoongArch Linux devices

12Distinct people
15Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
5.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Box64 - Linux Userspace x86_64 Emulator with a twist, targeted at ARM64, RV64 and LoongArch Linux devices

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 5:05:26 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year15 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-07-15 21:21:30 UTC to 2025-07-27 13:06:03 UTC.

012342021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303

What Hacker News says

2 sources
> PtitSeb [creator of Box86 and Box64 projects]: My main goal was to create an x86 emulator that ran on low-spec hardware [...] I wanted a small and fast emulator for my [ARM] Open Pandora [...] My goals were to have something that was fast and easy to use ... [while] the main goal of QEMU is to be as precise and as close to the real hardware as possible[, I accept] some approximation [for speed] Link to Box64: https://github.com/ptitSeb/box64 Benchmarks seem to reveal a performance of 85% the original.
In There is Life After the Death of x86 [ - The Box86 and Box64 projects]
Until last week, I had a full Debian amd64 systemd container to run invidious on an ARM64 machine (a ROCKpro64) running Armbian, since crystal (the language in which Invidious is written) does not have arm64 Debian packages. There's nothing special to make this work, regular commands work, for instance just running systemd-nspawn -b in an arm64 root folder works. Now I found a way to get arm64 crystal binaries. I got rid of the container, but Invidious still cross compiles to amd64, so qemu is still used to run an amd64 build Invidious of transparently. binfmt and qemu-user do wonders. It works well. One could use box64 [1] instead of qemu and it should provide better performance because it uses the native versions of some well known libraries (including libc6) instead of emulating them, but I failed to compile box64 this weekend so I sta
Read the rest
In Transparently running binaries from any architecture in Linux (2018)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.