HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
purcell
darcs-to-git
Ruby2012–2016
purcell / darcs-to-git

darcs-to-git

Convert/mirror darcs repos into git repos

2Distinct people
2Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
104GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Convert/mirror darcs repos into git repos

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

Darcs is good for personal use, but I moved away primarily because of the exponential merge problem. I think darcs2 takes care of it in most of the cases but NOT always. That…

atechie used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:00:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-05-09 07:03:18 UTC to 2016-10-02 20:48:36 UTC.

012012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
Darcs is not obviously better than git, and I say that as a person that's used Darcs for many, many years (and who has at least patch in the Darcs codebase). Darcs main feature is the simplicity of its data model. Just a pile of patches that compose to produce some code. Push and pull them at will. It's very neat. Darcs used to have the advantage a nice interactive UI, but git pretty much stole it wholesale with all the '-p' options (git add -p, git checkout -p, git reset -p) so it doesn't win there any more. Darcs also has the massive downside of not being able to hold more than one branch at a time in a directory. Do you want to switch contexts? 'darcs get' to a new directory and start over. On my most active darcs project I have about 50 directories all with random unpushed WIP patches in them. In git that would just be a bunch of stas
Read the rest
hes, which are much easier to search through. Nowadays, if I start tweaking a project that is still in Darcs, I'll immediately switch it to git: https://github.com/purcell/darcs-to-git
In Gitless: a version control system

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.