HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
qnblackcat
uYouPlus
Logos2022–2023
qnblackcat / uYouPlus · Archived

uYouPlus

uYou+ is a modified version of uYou (made by @MiRO92) with additional features and mainly made for non jailbroken users!

9Distinct people
11Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
7.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

uYou+ is a modified version of uYou (made by @MiRO92) with additional features and mainly made for non jailbroken users!

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

And at 12$ a month I still have to watch through all these 1min long sponsored segments. YouTube without sponsorblock became unusable. For iOS I recommend uYouPlus:…

mccorrinall used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month11 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-02-13 18:11:32 UTC to 2023-11-04 07:21:07 UTC.

0122022-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 20222022-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 20222022-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-03-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 20222022-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20222022-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20222022-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20222022-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20222022-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20222022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20222022-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Oct 20222022-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20222022-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-12-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Dec 20222022-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jan 20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20232023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 20232023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 20232023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20232023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20232023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 20232023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20232023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20232023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Oct 20232023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20232023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

11 sources
Like clockwork, each time an article like this one is published, individuals emerge to pressure others into watching advertisements with remarks like "poor trillion dollar corporation," label them as "entitled" for not wanting to invest time in continuous ads (bearing in mind that time only moves forward and can't be reclaimed), or assert that paying for a premium subscription is not a significant expense. It could be $1 for all I care. Let us commence from the beginning. Perhaps not all of Hacker News' user base came online when the internet was still characterized by freedom and openness, and "content" was created to share information, whether accurate or not, or simply for entertainment. This state of affairs persisted for a few years during YouTube's early days, but the situation began to deteriorate around 2010. From 1997 to 2009, on
Read the rest
e could argue that the internet was, to a large extent, a tolerable place to be. The aggressive monetization and profiling tactics pursued by the mega-corporations that have tightly gripped the internet, driven by the unrelenting pursuit of endless year-over-year growth, have turned the internet into a breeding ground for scams and content designed to evoke manipulable emotional responses such as anger, sadness, and regret. I am unwavering in my refusal to tolerate advertisements, whether in videos, music, or on websites, regardless of how vigorously these companies or their supporters attempt to persuade people to sink more of their time passively being bombarded with ads. Even engaging in debates with these individuals serves their purpose because, like Jehovah's Witnesses, their objective is to shift the argument and move the goalposts until they can declare victory, or gain the moral high ground defending the trillion-dollar corp. For me, YouTube is a pastime, not a profession or a job. If beer money can be derived from it, that's wonderful. Nowadays, most YouTubers feature videos with non-skippable ads inserted by Google, run Patreon campaigns for direct support, sell merchandise, and include sponsored segments within their videos. I only realized the extent of this when I used SponsorBlock for a couple of years, and its API failed a few days ago. Google does not require my financial support, and I have no intention of squandering my valuable time on their unskippable advertising. Nor do I wish to be profiled by them. If they are truly facing financial difficulties, they can reduce their relentless year-on-year growth. A well-established, consistently profitable company can support families without exploiting the user base. I feel no guilt in employing every means at my disposal to counteract their ceaseless efforts to make the internet a less enjoyable place: it's my device, and my rules. The day Google demands payment for its services similar to Netflix, I will simply cease using it altogether. Until then, I remain indifferent to the opinions of internet strangers or corporate advocates who label me as "entitled"—their words hold no sway over me. I will continue to pursue my course of action and assist those who share the same stance. You are free to disable your ad-blockers and subscribe to the premium service if you so choose. I will not, and I will support (to me) worthy content creators on Patreon where applicable. Google shan't see nor earn no money from me. Now, for those who find themselves entangled in this bog and wish to eliminate ads: * Firefox, Chromium etc: µblock origin [0] + SponsorBlock [1] * Safari: Invidious [2] and Piped [3] * iOS (no jailbreak needed): uYouPlus [4], uYouExtra [5], Yattee [6] * Android: ReVanced [7], GrayJay [8] * Android TV / Shield / FireTV / FireStick: SmartTube [9] * webOS (LG TV): dev mode + sideload [10] My own setup: µblock origin on Firefox in Windows, Piped on macOS, uYouPlus on iOS, SmartTube on a FireStick for the LG C2. SponsorBlock is either directly and natively integrated or enabled separately where needed. [0] https://redd.it/17j6ygs [1] https://sponsor.ajay.app [2] https://api.invidious.io [3] https://github.com/TeamPiped/Piped/wiki/Instances [4] https://github.com/qnblackcat/uYouPlus [5] https://github.com/arichorn/uYouPlusExtra [6] https://github.com/yattee/yattee [7] https://revanced.app [8] https://grayjay.app [9] https://github.com/yuliskov/SmartTube [10] https://github.com/webosbrew/dev-manager-desktop
In YouTube's plan backfires, people are installing better ad blockers

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.