HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
quarkusio
quarkus
Java2019–2026
quarkusio / quarkus

quarkus

Quarkus: Supersonic Subatomic Java.

7Distinct people
9Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
16KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Quarkus: Supersonic Subatomic Java.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year9 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-04-17 22:12:19 UTC to 2026-02-22 15:14:52 UTC.

01232019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

9 sources
- Language: Java 17/Kotlin - API Layer: Quarkus (most projects https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus), Vert.x (small projects https://vertx.io/) - DB: Postgres, in-memory H2 for simple stuff - Testing: JUnit 5, Testcontainers to automatically start + stop DB Docker containers with tests (https://www.testcontainers.org) - Mocking: Mockito (https://github.com/mockito/mockito) or Mockk (Kotlin, https://mockk.io) - Dependency Injection: CDI (built into Quarkus, for Vert.x you can initalize Weld when the app starts https://weld.cdi-spec.org) - Build tool: Gradle with Kotlin DSL - Other tools: Kover: automatic code-coverage reports from JaCoCo/IntelliJ (https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx-kover) Ktlint + Detekt: Kotlin linting/static analysis (https://ktlint.github.io, https://detekt.github.io/detekt) PMD, Spotbugs, Nullaway: Java linting/
Read the rest
In Ask HN: What is a modern Java environment?
As in, do people have entirely different ideas of how to write code so that what code looks like from one project to the next is not guaranteed any sort of regularity? Yeah, pretty much. Though it falls mostly into two categories: 1) "Haskell on the JVM". Pure functional, algebraic effects, monads, custom operators/DSL's the whole nine yards. This would be the Typelevel ecosystem stuff, and ZIO/Scalaz/FS2/Cats/etc. (Actually, some of the ZIO stuff is not so wild. I think it's fairly digestible/easy compared to some of the more "hardcore" scala FP libraries) 2) "Better Java"/Pythonic etc. Doesn't tend to be heavily OO or FP but just sort of a mishmash of features of both to get stuff done. Li Haoyi's libraries are a great example of this. I can imagine this being an issue if you were working with it in a professional context, or on a te
Read the rest
am that had differing ideas about what Scala ought to look like. Being a personal project, I've done a bunch of stuff that you probably wouldn't find recommended online. I am using Quarkus/Vertx Java libs, and a lot of Enterprise Java (javax/jakarta) stuff. (Note: I actually wrote a Quarkus extension to add support for compiling Scala 3 so that it could be used with Quarkus' ecosystem) https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/18431 --------- That being said, the online Scala community is helpful, even if FP-oriented. On the Discord you'll find deep expertise and answers to most anything you ask. And believe it or not they won't burn you alive if you say "Hey I'm not really interested in hardcore FP". I owe a lot of what (little) I know to a handful of members on there (tpolecat, Balmung, Aly, Ethan) who always seem to have time to answer my dumb questions.
In Typelevel Scala and the future of the Scala ecosystem (2014)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.