HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
quicklisp
quicklisp-projects
OPEN SOURCE2014–2017
quicklisp / quicklisp-projects

quicklisp-projects

Metadata for projects tracked by Quicklisp.

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
424GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Metadata for projects tracked by Quicklisp.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-08-21 13:48:33 UTC to 2017-09-29 16:38:49 UTC.

012014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
This still doesn't solve the problem of upstream security, since it requires clients trust the Quicklisp repository which is centralized rather than the individual package authors. The chain of trust is now bigger and more fragile. Quicklisp works by periodically pulling packages from their official (or unofficial) repos into a centralized repository controlled by Xach. Xach then creates a Quicklisp "release" based on the set of pulled packages. Quicklisp users end up pulling from Xach's repository rather than upstream directly. This PGP verification update only applies to the second path: Quicklisp user to Xach's centralized repository. In terms of actual security of Quicklisp, the situation is still not at all good, since Xach is using unsafe methods to pull code from upstream into his centralized repository: $ git clone https://githu
Read the rest
b.com/quicklisp/quicklisp-projects Cloning into 'quicklisp-projects'... remote: Counting objects: 9495, done. remote: Total 9495 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack reused 9495 Receiving objects: 100% (9495/9495), 1.70 MiB | 1.22 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (1653/1653), done. $ egrep -R 'git://|http://' quicklisp-projects/ |wc -l 125 There are ~125 projects in Quicklisp that are fetched over unencrypted and trivially man-in-the-middled protocols. Moreover, the centralized Quicklisp architecture is also vulnerable to hacking since it provides a single point of failure. Suggestions that will provide actual security: + Scrap the centralized package distribution model. + Quicklisp acts as a metadata/added-value repository and keeps providing releases but the Quicklisp client ends up hitting upstream and not a central repository controlled by a middle man. + If upstream sources are insecure (git/http), flag and warn on install by default. We had a lot of these (the important bits) with asdf-install. Unfortunately, when people started adopting Quicklisp because of the unimportant bits (convenience) they threw the baby out with the bathwater and ended up compromising on the things that truly matter. It's not too late to recognize this and pull back from something that will never be secure. My suggestions add up to adding the convenience layer to a model that's basically asdf-install that can pull software from multiple sources.
In OpenPGP and SHA verification

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.