HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
quorumcontrol
tupelo-wasm-sdk
TypeScript2020–2020
quorumcontrol / tupelo-wasm-sdk

tupelo-wasm-sdk

(ALPHA) A wasm-based TypeScript sdk that does not require the RPC server.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
8GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

(ALPHA) A wasm-based TypeScript sdk that does not require the RPC server.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-02-11 17:45:03 UTC to 2020-03-25 16:24:01 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 102020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 22020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 23

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 102020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC2020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC110
Feb 172020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 22020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 92020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 162020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 232020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
dgit dev here: first, let me say git-ssb is a great project as well! We see a few distinct advantages: - Using dgit doesn't require running a "node" of any kind (aka an SSB peer). This is possible because of the unique architecture of the Tupelo DLT: https://github.com/quorumcontrol/tupelo. - Because of ^, installing and adding a dgit remote to your existing workflow is super easy. - The storage in dgit is separated from the ownership of the repo. This means you can distribute the actual git objects across any storage system you would like, see my comment to cfstras below. ssb is a few years ahead here - having a web ui and more robust suite of collaboration tools is great, but we're hoping to add those features down the road as well! Another unique advantage is the Tupelo js client (https://github.com/QuorumControl/tupelo-wasm-sdk) can r
Read the rest
un fully in the browser, meaning a fully decentralized UI is possible!
In Dgit: Git with decentralized remotes

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.