HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
QwenLM
qwen-code
TypeScript2025–2026
QwenLM / qwen-code

qwen-code

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

15Distinct people
16Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
30KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month16 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-07-22 21:32:47 UTC to 2026-10-19 14:41:04 UTC.

0123452025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 commentsJul 20252025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 20262026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 2026

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 20252025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC312
Aug 20252025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC514
Sep 20252025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Oct 20252025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20252025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20252025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
Jan 20262026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20262026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20262026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20262026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC110
May 20262026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20262026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 20262026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20262026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Sep 20262026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20262026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

16 sources
Wouldn't a fair criticism of OTEL be that you only see what these harnesses are willing to show you? There have been numerous scandals of AI companies offering CC/cursor alternatives, then indexing data they never should have; specifically Z.ai [0], ByteDance Trae [1] and Alibaba Qwen [2]. Maybe the argument should be that all harnesses should be sandboxed and monitored for all networking. If it were me, all AI harnesses would be running on a VM with network logging enabled. Beyond not being able to trust what data they send via the harness, you should audit what data they access. [0] https://www.chosun.com/english/industry-en/2026/09/22/ABYLC3... [1] https://github.com/segmentationf4u1t/trae_telemetry_research [2] https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/issues/11198
In If you don't run your own LLM proxy, how do you know whats going on?
See also: agent harness in 50 lines (based on mini-swe-agent). https://minimal-agent.com/ I followed this tutorial earlier today and I'm having a lot of fun with it. https://gist.github.com/a-n-d-a-i/cb5e929b4c87b8d185760d0264... I added a 2nd while loop so that it takes user input. And vendored my tiny llm lib (so it's 150 lines now, and dependency free :) --- As for context-sculpting, the economics are different when not touching the context gives you the >98% discount everyone's doing now. (Although it might be worth fiddling with the suffix... not sure yet!) e.g. this issue: "ToolSearch saves ~15K tokens per request in prompt size, but at the cost of breaking prefix-based caching for models like DeepSeek that rely on stable prefixes. For heavy users of DeepSeek through OpenRouter, the savings from smaller prompts are dwarfed by the in
Read the rest
In Context Sculpting
Kind of glad that I missed the Cursor hype then rapid slide into enshittification, since I didn't think its goal of replacing an IDE would be a winning strategy and instead went for IDE plugins/extensions AI assistants like Augment Code, GitHub Copilot and Gemini Code Assist as they work in both Rider/Intellij, VS Code and NeoVim. I'm assuming I don't use AI as much as most devs as I'm still comfortably within Augment Code's 600 user messages/mo dev plan limit which IMO is great value for being able to use its Context Engine. If I ever exceeded that I'd likely temporarily switch to Qwen Coder's effectively unlimited free tier [1] until the next quota refill. Not sure if Augment's going to increase their prices or downgrade their quotas since they're still at the whims of Claude Sonnet / GPT 5 API pricing, but if they do I'd be looking at
Read the rest
moving to an open model solution like Open Code / Roo Code so I can easily switch to the best value coding models of the day, between Qwen3 coder, Grok Code Fast, GLM, Kimi K2, DeepSeek, etc we're spoilt for choice [2]. [1] https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code [2] https://openrouter.ai/rankings#categories
In September 15, 2025: The Day the Industry Admitted AI Subscriptions Don't Work
Yeah you can, so long as you're hosting your local LLM through something with an OpenAI-compatible API (which is a given for almost all local servers at this point, including LM Studio). https://opencode.ai and https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code both allow you to configure any API as the LLM provider. That said, running agentic workloads on local LLMs will be a short and losing battle against context size if you don't have hardware specifically bought for this purpose. You can get it running and it will work for several autonomous actions but not nearly as long as a hosted frontier model will work.
In iPhone Air
You can use Claude Code against Kimi K2, DeepSeek, Qwen, etc. The 20$ a month plan gets you access to a token amount of sonnet for coding, but that wouldn't be indicative of how people are using it. https://gist.github.com/WolframRavenwolf/0ee85a65b10e1a442e4... We gave Gemini CLI a spin, it is kinda unhinged, I am impressed you were able to get your results. After reading through the Gemini CLI codebase, it appears to be a shallow photocopy knockoff of Claude Code, but it has no built in feedback loops or development guides other than, "you are an excellent senior programmer ..." the built in prompts are embarrassingly naive. Qwen has it's own agent which I haven't used https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code Another is https://github.com/sst/opencode
In AI doesn't lighten the burden of mastery
Well, if you download Qwen Code https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code it is free up to 2000 api calls a day. Not sure if GLM-4.5 Air is good, but non-Air one is fabulous. I know for free API access there is pollinations ai project. Also llm7. If you just use the web chat's you can use most of the best models for free without API. There are ways to 'emulate' an API automatically.. I was thinking about adding this to my aicodeprep-gui app so it could automatically paste and then cut. Some MCP servers exist that you can use and it will automatically paste or cut from those web chat's and route it to an API interface. OpenAI offers free tokens for most models, 2.5mil or 250k depending on model. Cerebras has some free limits, Gemini... Meta has plentiful free API for Llama 4 because.. lets face it, it sucks, but it is okay/not bad for stuff lik
Read the rest
e summarizing text. If you really wanted to code for exactly $0 you could use pollinations ai, in Cline extension (for VS Code) set to use "openai-large" (which is GPT 4.1). If you plan using all the best web chat's like Kimi K2, z.ai's GLM models, Qwen 3 chat, Gemini in AI Studio, OpenAI playground with o3 or o4-mini. You can go forever without being charged money. Pollinations 'openai-large' works fine in Cline as an agent to edit files for you etc.
In How I code with AI on a budget/free

Showing the 15 most recent of 16 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.