HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
rasadov
Fertit
Go2025–2025
rasadov / Fertit

Fertit

A Go-based web application for sending newsletters and allowing subscribers to manage their preferences. Designed for ease of deployment (Docker-ready), with a modern web UI and admin dashboard.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
23GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A Go-based web application for sending newsletters and allowing subscribers to manage their preferences. Designed for ease of deployment (Docker-ready), with a modern web UI and admin dashboard.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-07-20 23:34:01 UTC to 2025-07-21 17:09:03 UTC.

012025-07-20 23:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 20, 23:002025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 01:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 02:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 03:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 04:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 05:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 07:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 08:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 21, 08:002025-07-21 09:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 10:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 11:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 13:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 14:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 16:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 17:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJul 21, 17:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 20, 23:002025-07-20 23:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 21, 00:002025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 01:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 01:002025-07-21 01:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 02:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 02:002025-07-21 02:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 03:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 03:002025-07-21 03:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 04:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 04:002025-07-21 04:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 05:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 05:002025-07-21 05:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 06:002025-07-21 06:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 07:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 07:002025-07-21 07:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 08:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 08:002025-07-21 08:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 09:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 09:002025-07-21 09:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 10:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 10:002025-07-21 10:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 11:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 11:002025-07-21 11:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 12:002025-07-21 12:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 13:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 13:002025-07-21 13:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 14:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 14:002025-07-21 14:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 15:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 15:002025-07-21 15:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 16:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 16:002025-07-21 16:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 17:00:00 UTC000
Jul 21, 17:002025-07-21 17:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 18:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

2 sources
rasadov·Jul 21, 2025Submission

Show HN: Built an email marketing platform after paying $230/month

Spent the last month building Fertit - basically a newsletter manager but you bring your own SMTP and skip the DevOps nightmare. All the features (subscriber management, admin dashboard, custom preferences) without the infrastructure markup. The math that broke me: Mailchimp: $230/month for 15k contacts My solution: $10/month infrastructure + $10 SendGrid = unlimited What I learned: The "enterprise" features are mostly database operations with SMTP APIs. But the 3 weeks of Go/PostgreSQL/Redis setup explains why people just pay ConvertKit $300/month. Here's the thing: Even open-sourcing it, I realized most people don't want to deal with servers, Docker configs, and database migrations. So I built an affordable hosted service starting at $5/month. More features and security measurements, zero setup - just bring your SMTP and start sending.
Read the rest
You get all the cost savings without any of the self-hosting headaches. Now testing this hosted version at $5/month - middle ground between DIY pain and SaaS pricing. Hosted version: https://www.fertit.com Open source: https://github.com/rasadov/NewsletterManager Anyone else tired of choosing between expensive self-hosting and expensive SaaS? Would love feedback on the approach.
44 points · Open discussion
I just canceled my Mailchimp account after hitting their "Standard" plan limits. $230/month to send emails to 15k subscribers feels insane when my entire server infrastructure costs $50/month. Started building my own newsletter platform (Fertit) and realized most of the "premium" features are just basic CRUD operations with SMTP integration. The math is wild: Mailchimp Standard: $230/month for 15k contacts My current costs: $50/month for unlimited (using my own SMTP) But then I realized why people pay it - the setup/maintenance time is brutal. Spent 3 weeks just getting subscriber management right. So the real question: would you pay $10/month for a middle ground? All the features of the big players, but you bring your own SMTP (SendGrid, Mailgun, etc.) and own your data? Currently testing this approach - curious if others see the same pr
Read the rest
icing/ownership gap I do. GitHub: https://github.com/rasadov/NewsletterManager
In [dead]

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.