HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
raspberrypi
linux
C2012–2026
raspberrypi / linux

linux

Kernel source tree for Raspberry Pi-provided kernel builds. Issues unrelated to the linux kernel should be posted on the community forum at https://forums.raspberrypi.com/

34Distinct people
35Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
13.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Kernel source tree for Raspberry Pi-provided kernel builds. Issues unrelated to the linux kernel should be posted on the community forum at https://forums.raspberrypi.com/

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:56:56 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year35 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-10-24 11:57:18 UTC to 2026-04-15 07:10:21 UTC.

02462012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 2 submissions, 5 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC725
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 12, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Linux kernel There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first. In order to build the documentation, use make htmldocs or make pdfdocs. The formatted documentation can also be read online at: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory, several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation. Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel. Build status for rpi-6.12.y: Build status for rpi-6.18.y:
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

35 sources
>software support is fantastic. Unreliable USB: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3259 Unreliable Wi-Fi: * https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/7092 * https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/7111 * https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/7272 I don't understand why many say that RPi software/firmware support is 'fantastic'. Maybe it used to be in the beginning compared to other chips and boards, but right now it's a bit above average: they ignore many things which is out of their control/can't debug and fix (as in Wi-Fi chip firmware).
In The Orange Pi 6 Plus
This is only very tangentially related, but I got flashbacks to a time where we had dozens of edge/IoT raspberry pi devices with completely unupgradeable kernels with a bug that would make the whole USB stack shut down after "roughly a week" (7-9 days) of uptime. Once it got shut down, the only way to fix it was to do a full restart, and, at the time, we couldn't really be restarting those devices (not even at night). This means that every single device would seemingly randomly completely break: touchscreen, keyboard, modems, you name it. Everything broke. And since the modem was part of it, we would lose access to the device — very hard to solve because maintenance teams were sometimes hours (& flights!) away. It seemed to happen at random, and it was very hard to trace it down because we were also gearing up for an absolutely massive (h
Read the rest
undreds of devices, and then a couple of months later, thousands) launch, and had pretty much every conceivable issue thrown at us, from faulty USB hubs, broken modems (which would also kill the USB hub if they pulled too much power), and I'm sure I've forgotten a bunch of other issues. Plus, since the problem took a week to manifest, we couldn't really iterate on fixes quickly - after deploying a "potential fix", we'd have to wait a whole week to actually see if it worked. I can vividly remember the joy I had when I managed to get the issue to consistently happen only in the span of 2 hours instead of a week. I had no idea _why_, but at least I could now get serviceable feedback loops. Eventually, after trying to mess with every variable we could, and isolating this specific issue from the other ones, we somehow figured out that the issue was indeed a bug in the kernel, or at least in one of its drivers: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/5088 . We had many serial ports and a pattern of opening and closing them which triggered the issue. Upgrading the kernel was impossible due to a specific vendor lock-in, and we had to fix live devices and ship hundreds of them in less than a month. In the end, we managed to build several layers on top of this unpatchable ever-growing USB-incapacitating bug: (i) we changed our serial port access patterns to significantly reduce the frequency of crashes; (ii) we adjusted boot parameters to make it much harder to trigger (aka "throw more memory at the memory leak"); (iii) we built a system that proactively detected the issue and triggered a USB reset in a very controlled fashion (this would sometimes kill the network of the device for a while, but we had no choice!); (iv) if, for some reason, all else failed, a watchdog would still reboot the system (but we really _really_ _reaaaally_ didn't want this to happen). In a way, even though these issues suck, it's when we are faced with them that we really grow. We need to grab our whole troubleshooting arsenal, do things that would otherwise feel "wrong" or "inelegant", and push through the issues. Just thinking back to that period, I'm engulfed by a mix of gratitude for how much I learned, and an uneasy sense of dread (what if next time I won't be able to figure it out)?
In Nvidia-smi hangs indefinitely after ~66 days
Interesting, going through the comments… “WiFi is still via SDIO on the Broadcom chip, IIRC.” <https://www.jeffgeerling.com/comment/34061#comment-34061> And “Ran a quick search on Raspberry Pi's github linux repo and found where I got my info from re the stuff they took out on D0. From what I can see, they actually removed device tree support for parts of the chip they don't use on C0/C1 that are not present on D0, and folded these changes into the same DTS file. They also seem to have added a DTS specifically for the D0 stepping, which seems to be register changes, i.e. stuff that is present in both variants of the chip but has moved or needs to otherwise be handled differently between C1 and D0. See https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/pull/5847, specifically for the bits removed see <https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/pull/5847/commi
Read the rest
ts/8be08...>“ <https://www.jeffgeerling.com/comment/34061#comment-34061> Something broke. Without going through the obsd code it remains unknown. Unless there is reference to uart3 & uart4?
In Raspberry Pi 5 support (OpenBSD)
I'm really mixing two things and wasn't very clear about it. The pico can kinda deep sleep but it requires an external wakeup trigger. It can't deep sleep from its own clock. Even so its deep sleep is pretty high power compared to most embedded chips. The zero (w) and zero 2 w don't have the equivalent of suspend-to-ram with a low sleep current. I'm not sure if that's a limitation of the SOC or the driver or both, but rpi was fairly clear it wasn't in the cards: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/1281
In Extreme Pi Boot Optimization
I see the Raspberry Pi model B+ available right now on Adafruit for $30. It has a single core 700 MHz CPU and 512M RAM. The Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is available right now for $15 with a 1 GHz 64 bit quad core CPU and 512 MB RAM. So it seems to me that you can get a Raspberry Pi SBC today, that has higher or equal specs in every regard, for a lower cost than the original. Am I missing something? Looking at https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux, I scrolled a few pages of commits and didn't even see one from outside the Raspberry Pi org. I'm picking through their merged PRs and it looks like maybe there are a couple, it's hard to tell. But it looks to me like they just do a great job supporting their own product?
In The Raspberry Pi 5 Is No Match for a Tini-Mini-Micro PC
RPi OS is also using a modified kernel and packages that include the v4l2 codec and FFmpeg (rpi-ffmpeg, which I ever tested). https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/46f21cab3e888823... https://github.com/jc-kynesim/rpi-ffmpeg These staging drivers do not exist in the Linux mainline. It means that you will not get hardware acceleration support when compiling and installing the kernel from `torvalds/linux` instead of `raspberrypi/linux`. As for the RK3588 SBCs, you are free to choose to use Linux 5.10 LTS (legacy) or 6.1 LTS kernel, both of which are officially supported by Rockchip. Or alternatively, use the bleed edge kernel 6.9. Official 3D acceleration will be available in Mesa 24.1 and Linux 6.10, and the developers have also backported it to 6.1 LTS for ease of use. In addition to Armbian, you can also use `ubuntu-rockchip`, whic
Read the rest
h has full hardware-accelerated desktop/server Ubuntu 22.04/24.04 LTS support. https://github.com/Joshua-Riek/ubuntu-rockchip The VPU used by video decoding has nothing to do with 3D/GPU. With `ffmpeg-rockchip` and `libv4l-rkmpp` you get 4k@60 hw decoding support in Chromium and MPV player, and 8k@60 hw decoding support in Kodi. https://github.com/nyanmisaka/ffmpeg-rockchip/wiki/Rendering Jellyfin also provides complete transcoding pipeline support on the RK3588 based SBCs. https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/administration/hardware-ac...
In Beating Jeff's 3.14 Ghz Raspberry Pi 5
> Another reason not to use it! Perfectly valid reason! I in fact am buying Orange Pi SBCs this days > I used it as a hotspot. Armbian has some weird obsolete NetworkManager, that does not work with WPA2. OpenWRD does not support other functions I need. I don't follow that. Armbian has the same package versions as Debian. I just checked on an Armbian Bullseye I have in an Armv7 board and it has support for WPA2 Personal, WPA2 Enterprise, and WPA3. If you want to keep a regular Linux distribution probably your best bet is using something like 'hostapd' > And I did not use buildin networking managment, because it keept switching network interface names (multiple WIFI and LAN cards over USB). I can bind NetworkManager config to MAC and skip interface names completely. You can set those names static easily with systemd. Create a file for ever
Read the rest
y nic like '/etc/systemd/network/10-eth10.link' and fill it like: [Match] MACAddress=75:1a:d3:80:85:59 [Link] Name=eth10 And then update your initramfs: update-initramfs -u And ready! :) > It is the most basic task for Linux computer... Well, it depends for whom. Also, you need adequate software and hardware. About wireless, the chipset in an RPi4 is designed for clients, not APs, and its capabilities on having multiple clients are quite limited: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3010 Routers like the Omnia Turris, Mikrotik, PC Engines... use specific mini PCIe cards that can be as expensive as a full Raspberry Pi 4, just for the wireless. https://www.discomp.eu/wireless-minipci-cards_c14501412.html
In How Brompton Bicycle uses Raspberry Pi technology to improve production [video]

Showing the 15 most recent of 35 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.