HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
reactjs
react-future
JavaScript2014–2015
reactjs / react-future · Archived

react-future

Specs & docs for potential future and experimental React APIs and JavaScript syntax.

10Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Specs & docs for potential future and experimental React APIs and JavaScript syntax.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-07-21 16:30:50 UTC to 2015-12-29 20:09:11 UTC.

01232014-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 20142014-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2014-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2014-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2015-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 20152015-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 2015

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 20142014-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-08-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Aug 20142014-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20142014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20142014-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-11-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Nov 20142014-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-12-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Dec 20142014-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-02-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Feb 20152015-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-03-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 20152015-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-04-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Apr 20152015-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-05-01 00:00:00 UTC101
May 20152015-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20152015-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 20152015-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20152015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20152015-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20152015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Nov 20152015-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20152015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
Web workers can win you huge performance boosts. In my work we implemented auto-indexing of client-side resources so you can search without lag or hiccups, and we published a library [0] so that others could use it. Pushing stuff as much stuff as you can to web workers is definitely something that needs to get more love. This isn't a particularly new idea. Here's a short writeup about this in react-future [1]. Roughly one month ago someone published react-worker-dom [2] and wrote a blog post [3] about it. But this is ultimately just a workaround for terrible DOM APIs. Maybe I've been living under a rock, but I haven't seen any new DOM API proposals to help deal with these problems. The only new DOM API I've heard about is web components, which still runs in the UI thread. Does shadow DOM win us any huge performance boosts? In the last few
Read the rest
weeks I've looked through the source for a lot of elements in the polymer catalogue [4]. This is probably going to come off as a bit rant-y and negative, and it's totally tangential to the topic, but I'm totally unconvinced that web components are the way forward. These APIs are too complicated and they rely on side-effects which are very difficult to trace and debug. It's code that says: Execute this side-effect and I'm going to hope that now my environment is in an expected state. Oh, you screwed up with a typo? Don't worry, I'll just fail silently, good luck debugging me! You import files and then you pray that it polluted your namespace with the correct globals. This is not an acceptable way for building web apps in 2016. In contrast, I've been using css-modules [5] for the last few months, and although it has its own shortcomings and problems, I love that it makes it makes your usage very explicit and easy to trace. If you look at the css-modules link, you'll see why it's so great: You're explicitly saying you want to pull in that stylesheet and reference that specific class. The same goes when you're using React: You import a component and you put it in the render function's return value. If you try rendering something invalid, it'll scream as you. You can debug this much more easily because you know the file that was referenced and the specific export that's being used. [0] https://treasure-data.github.io/redux-search/ [1] https://github.com/reactjs/react-future/tree/master/05%20-%2... [2] https://github.com/web-perf/react-worker-dom [3] http://blog.nparashuram.com/2015/12/react-web-worker-rendere... [4] https://elements.polymer-project.org/ [5] https://github.com/css-modules/css-modules#css-modules
In 2016 will be the year of concurrency on the web

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.