HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Redocly
redoc
TypeScript2016–2024
Redocly / redoc

redoc

📘 OpenAPI/Swagger-generated API Reference Documentation

13Distinct people
15Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
26KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

📘 OpenAPI/Swagger-generated API Reference Documentation

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year15 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-08-03 09:19:19 UTC to 2024-09-22 11:56:23 UTC.

02462016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC615
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

15 sources
There are a few other tools out there that are at least marginally better than the default Swagger UI such as ReDoc (https://github.com/Redocly/redoc). When we redid the Mux docs (https://docs.mux.com/api-reference) we actually just decided to build our own renderer. It really wasn't as bad as you might think, at build time we pull in the JSON version of our OAS spec and render it as a static build in our Nextjs app. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't trivial, but the benefit of having complete control over the output has been well worth it.
In Show HN: I’m building open-source headless CMS for technical content
Also an Atlassian here. For anyone wondering, we tend to use Confluence for planning, decisions, team process, tech specs, etc but use an internal view of DAC[0] for code docs. Think Hugo[1] crossed with redoc[2] with a dash of GraphQL support. Unfortunately the docs-in-repo + PRs-for-updates approach has way more friction for drive-by-corrections/commentary/Q&A from people not on the team, so it's not a holy grail either. [0]: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/ [1]: https://gohugo.io [2]: https://github.com/Redocly/redoc
In Show HN: BookStack – An open source wiki platform and alternative to Confluence
The best CLI documentation generator I've found so far is Redoc[1]. There are tons of hosted solutions for docs (Apimatic, SwaggerHub, Stoplight, and Apicurio Studio). My favorites are SwaggerHub[2] and Apicurio[3], because their editors are solid and they have good compatibility with all the nooks and crannies of the OpenAPI v3 spec. 1. https://github.com/Redocly/redoc 2. https://swagger.io/tools/swaggerhub 3. https://studio.apicur.io
In Show HN: A faster way to prototype your APIs using OpenAPI 3 and Swagger UI
Indeed, it sounds like there was a bit of a problem "between keyboard and chair" when it came to the Postman / Paw user with whom you interacted. I had good success, just recently, using Paw to knock out the broad strokes an OpenAPI description, including indications of integer, string, boolean, date, etc. After I got the hang of thinking in terms of OpenAPI, I converted the JSON to YAML and started fine-tuning and DRY'ing the description in Emacs. I would still use Paw as an exploratory tool — it's not perfect, but I find it more convenient than maintaining a collection of scripts and snippets to experiment with API input/output. Next time I need to write an OpenAPI description, though, if I can't auto-generate it from the server code (that was the case recently), I'll just author it by hand. It's not too big of a chore when done in YAML
Read the rest
format, with the help of "feedback loops" per ReDoc[1] and Swagger Editor[2]. [1] https://github.com/Rebilly/ReDoc/ [2] http://editor.swagger.io/
In Paw – macOS HTTP client for testing and describing APIs
I was recently tasked with tightening up and documenting an HTTP API I didn't write. The original authors used Django and Django REST Framework[1], but lacking deep experience with either, mostly rolled their own functions for requests, responses, and communications with the back-end databases and other external data sources. Rather than attempting to sort it out, I used Paw[2] to get my arms around the API from a consumer's POV, had Paw generate a skeleton of an OpenAPI 2.0 (Swagger 2.0)[3] description, converted it to YAML[4] and began putting flesh on the bones manually (yaml-mode[5] in Emacs is pretty decent). In the process of covering all the bases with precise req/res definitions and examples (yay, JSON Schema![6]), I uncovered a lot of corner cases in the API's functionality and made sure they were handled properly or at least doc
Read the rest
umented well. I co-located the openapi.yaml file and ReDoc[7] with the API, and now it has beautiful web-based documentation. It also has JS, Python and curl code samples for all endpoints, generated with Paw and included in the YAML formatted description. ReDoc displays them nicely, with syntax highlighting. In short, even though I worked "backwards" — matching the OpenAPI description to the functionality — it was a fruitful exercise and the results seem pretty good. Not to mention, all the above is readily tracked with git and can live right next to the server's source code... compared to, say, an equivalent documentation effort accomplished with MS Word. [1] http://www.django-rest-framework.org/ [2] https://paw.cloud/client [3] https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/master/ver... [4] http://www.yaml.org/ [5] https://github.com/yoshiki/yaml-mode [6] http://json-schema.org/ [7] https://github.com/Rebilly/ReDoc/
In Swagger is now the OpenAPI Specification

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.