HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
REhints
HexRaysCodeXplorer
C++2015–2015
REhints / HexRaysCodeXplorer

HexRaysCodeXplorer

Hex-Rays Decompiler plugin for better code navigation

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Hex-Rays Decompiler plugin for better code navigation

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:02:50 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-09-12 22:14:54 UTC to 2015-09-15 12:43:39 UTC.

012015-09-12 21:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 12, 21:002015-09-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-13 03:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-13 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-13 09:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-13 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-13 15:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-13 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-13 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-13 21:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 03:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 14, 03:002015-09-14 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 09:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 15:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 21:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-15 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-15 03:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-15 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-15 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-15 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-15 09:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-15 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-15 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-15 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsSep 15, 12:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 12, 21:002015-09-12 21:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 13, 00:002015-09-13 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 13, 03:002015-09-13 03:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 13, 06:002015-09-13 06:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 13, 09:002015-09-13 09:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 13, 12:002015-09-13 12:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 15:00:00 UTC000
Sep 13, 15:002015-09-13 15:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 13, 18:002015-09-13 18:00:00 UTC2015-09-13 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 13, 21:002015-09-13 21:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 00:002015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 03:002015-09-14 03:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 06:002015-09-14 06:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 09:002015-09-14 09:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 12:002015-09-14 12:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 15:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 15:002015-09-14 15:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 18:002015-09-14 18:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 21:002015-09-14 21:00:00 UTC2015-09-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 00:002015-09-15 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-15 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 03:002015-09-15 03:00:00 UTC2015-09-15 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 06:002015-09-15 06:00:00 UTC2015-09-15 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 09:002015-09-15 09:00:00 UTC2015-09-15 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 12:002015-09-15 12:00:00 UTC2015-09-15 15:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

1 sources
SoftICE was one of the most amazing utilities out there both for debugging as well as reverse engineering. The Wikipedia page is spot on about WinDbg/KD, but pretty out of date re: modern tools. Ollydbg2 came out more than half a decade ago and supports all the 64 bit registers and x86-64 instruction set. Immunity Debugger took the place as the defacto standard, and most modern scripts and tooling are built around Immunity for dynamic analysis and IDA Pro for static analysis. IDA Pro adopted QT natively, so the plugin communities are extending the hell out of what was already a great tool, and there are good plugins that export annotations/symbols that Immunity can consume so the union between static and dynamic analysis has never been smaller. If you don't have an IDA license, Immunity combined with Radare (read down) is still pretty pow
Read the rest
erful to play around with. Either way, the reverse engineering stuff out there is quite simply amazing. https://github.com/aquynh/capstone https://github.com/REhints/HexRaysCodeXplorer (this is CRAZY useful if you bought the Hex Rays license with IDA) https://github.com/ynvb/DIE - makes IDA even better ("DIE is an IDA python plugin designed to enrich IDA`s static analysis with dynamic data) https://portal.cert.org/web/mc-portal/pharos-static-analysis... - I haven't used this yet but Pharos is a static analysis tool out of Carnegie Melon that's particularly useful for C++ gen'd code. https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/sei_blog/2015/08/the-pharos-fra... Walks through some feature set. HexRays is great for somethings but when you F5 some block, you really are left wanting. This looks like it fills the gap quite nicely. http://www.radare.org/r/cmp.html - Comparison beween IDA and Radare (admittedly unfair, even titled so, ha) There are dozens of plugins I use which are just python scripts mapped to keyboard shortcuts so I don't even remember what they're called. Someone else is going to have to jump in because I'm not on my work machine and can't look it up. You lost Ring0 with the demise of SoftICE, but the RE community is more active than ever. Just watch a few CCC talks if you're not convinced. Just a note guys: I know you can pirate IDA but some companies just "do it right" and should be supported. I buy from Adafruit even though they're more expensive because I support them. IDA is one dude, who's responsive within the community, who goes out of his way to be nice and implement bug fixes and feature enhancements. I try not to get all preachy, but pirating IDA isn't stealing Visual Studio from Microsoft- you're ripping a dude who's contributed a lot to the community and even offers a free (granted less featureful) version.
In SoftICE: a kernel mode debugger for Windows

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.