HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
relevance
clojure-conj
Languages & Compilers2011–2011
relevance / clojure-conj

clojure-conj

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
134GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-11-11 23:16:58 UTC to 2011-11-16 09:23:19 UTC.

012011-11-11 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsNov 11, 18:002011-11-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-12 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-12 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-12 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-12 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-12 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-12 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-13 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-13 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-13 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-13 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-13 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-13 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-14 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsNov 14, 00:002011-11-14 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-14 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-14 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-14 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-15 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-15 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-15 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-15 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-15 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-15 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-16 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-16 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-16 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 16, 06:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Nov 11, 18:002011-11-11 18:00:00 UTC2011-11-12 00:00:00 UTC110
Nov 12, 00:002011-11-12 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-12 06:00:00 UTC000
Nov 12, 06:002011-11-12 06:00:00 UTC2011-11-12 12:00:00 UTC000
Nov 12, 12:002011-11-12 12:00:00 UTC2011-11-12 18:00:00 UTC000
Nov 12, 18:002011-11-12 18:00:00 UTC2011-11-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 13, 00:002011-11-13 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-13 06:00:00 UTC000
Nov 13, 06:002011-11-13 06:00:00 UTC2011-11-13 12:00:00 UTC000
Nov 13, 12:002011-11-13 12:00:00 UTC2011-11-13 18:00:00 UTC000
Nov 13, 18:002011-11-13 18:00:00 UTC2011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 14, 00:002011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-14 06:00:00 UTC000
Nov 14, 06:002011-11-14 06:00:00 UTC2011-11-14 12:00:00 UTC000
Nov 14, 12:002011-11-14 12:00:00 UTC2011-11-14 18:00:00 UTC000
Nov 14, 18:002011-11-14 18:00:00 UTC2011-11-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 00:002011-11-15 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-15 06:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 06:002011-11-15 06:00:00 UTC2011-11-15 12:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 12:002011-11-15 12:00:00 UTC2011-11-15 18:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 18:002011-11-15 18:00:00 UTC2011-11-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 16, 00:002011-11-16 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-16 06:00:00 UTC000
Nov 16, 06:002011-11-16 06:00:00 UTC2011-11-16 12:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Well I think its only cheaper at first and even if people know better they are forced to use a stupid java framework (that abstracts away the network) even if the know that it will end up badly. A other problem is that people often get tought that you need <input some bad framework>. You can't do distributed computing if you done use some kind of framework. At least the places I know they would never tell you something like "just send json from one node to the other if thats all you need". At clojure conj there where some talks about this, but the videos are not out jet. See these presentation on Concurrent Stream Processing (https://github.com/relevance/clojure-conj/blob/master/2011-s...) or this on Logs as Data (https://github.com/relevance/clojure-conj/blob/master/2011-s...) For a other example that works in quite simular ways look at
Read the rest
Storm (in use at twitter. Its all sequential abstractions. See this video by Nathan Marz (look all videos you can find): http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Storm For a more philospical perspective look at the videos by rich hickey: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy
In The plumber programmer

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.