HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
repowise-dev
repowise
Python2026–2026
repowise-dev / repowise

repowise

Codebase intelligence for AI and humans: code health scores, auto-generated docs, git analytics, dead code detection, and architectural decisions via MCP.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
8.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Codebase intelligence for AI and humans: code health scores, auto-generated docs, git analytics, dead code detection, and architectural decisions via MCP.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-04-05 23:15:37 UTC to 2026-04-06 20:15:26 UTC.

012026-04-05 23:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsApr 5, 23:002026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 01:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 02:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 04:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 05:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 07:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 08:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 6, 09:002026-04-06 10:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 11:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 13:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 14:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 16:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 17:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 19:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 20:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsApr 6, 20:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 5, 23:002026-04-05 23:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC110
Apr 6, 00:002026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 01:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 01:002026-04-06 01:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 02:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 02:002026-04-06 02:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 03:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 03:002026-04-06 03:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 04:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 04:002026-04-06 04:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 05:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 05:002026-04-06 05:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 06:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 06:002026-04-06 06:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 07:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 07:002026-04-06 07:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 08:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 08:002026-04-06 08:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 09:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 09:002026-04-06 09:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 10:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 10:002026-04-06 10:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 11:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 11:002026-04-06 11:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 12:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 12:002026-04-06 12:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 13:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 13:002026-04-06 13:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 14:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 14:002026-04-06 14:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 15:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 15:002026-04-06 15:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 16:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 16:002026-04-06 16:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 17:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 17:002026-04-06 17:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 18:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 18:002026-04-06 18:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 19:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 19:002026-04-06 19:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 20:00:00 UTC000
Apr 6, 20:002026-04-06 20:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 21:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

2 sources

Show HN: Repowise – Codebase intelligence for AI coding agents (open source)

Every AI coding session starts from zero. The agent doesn't know who owns a file, which files change together, which ones are dead, or why something was built that way. I got tired of Claude Code asking me "what does this service do?" on a codebase I've worked on for two years. The context is all there (git history, dependency graph, past decisions), it's just not in a format the agent can use. Repowise indexes your codebase into four layers: dependency graph (tree-sitter → NetworkX), git intelligence (hotspots, ownership, co-change patterns), auto-generated docs, and architectural decision records. These get exposed via 8 MCP tools. On each commit, only changed files get re-indexed. No full rebuilds, under 30 seconds. The decisions layer is the part I'm most excited about. It surfaces architectural intent from commit history: large diffs
Read the rest
, migration patterns, tradeoff language. It also tracks staleness as code evolves. Works well on repos with decent commit messages, less well on "fix" history. pip install repowise repowise init # ~25 min first time, <30s incremental repowise serve # MCP server + local dashboard Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. AGPL-3.0, self-hosted, your code stays on your machine. I'm running early benchmarks on SWE-Bench and SWE-QA. Results are promising, especially on tasks where grounded context matters. Publishing the full methodology soon. What's rough: Windows untested, language coverage is Python/TS/Go/Rust/Java/C/C++, decisions UX needs work. Happy to hear what breaks. Pre-indexed demos (FastAPI, Starlette) on the site. Working on Slack, Jira, and Linear integrations for the hosted team version. GitHub: github.com/repowise-dev/repowise Site: repowise.dev
1 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.