HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
rezabrizi
AtomicRing
C++2024–2024
rezabrizi / AtomicRing

AtomicRing

Very fast lock-free queue (thread safe)

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
189GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Very fast lock-free queue (thread safe)

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2024-05-19 22:19:44 UTC to 2024-06-02 04:07:34 UTC.

012024-05-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMay 192024-05-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 262024-05-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-06-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-06-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-06-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 2

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 192024-05-19 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-20 00:00:00 UTC110
May 202024-05-20 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-21 00:00:00 UTC000
May 212024-05-21 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-22 00:00:00 UTC000
May 222024-05-22 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-23 00:00:00 UTC000
May 232024-05-23 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-24 00:00:00 UTC000
May 242024-05-24 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-25 00:00:00 UTC000
May 252024-05-25 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-26 00:00:00 UTC000
May 262024-05-26 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-27 00:00:00 UTC000
May 272024-05-27 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-28 00:00:00 UTC000
May 282024-05-28 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-29 00:00:00 UTC000
May 292024-05-29 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-30 00:00:00 UTC000
May 302024-05-30 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-31 00:00:00 UTC000
May 312024-05-31 00:00:00 UTC2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 12024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-06-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22024-06-02 00:00:00 UTC2024-06-03 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Yeah, leaving small old buffers behind seems like a major no-no to me. It could be useful if you think you'll shrink back down, but it feels like cache locality suffering and iteration/tracking penalties strongly incentive getting rid of the old buffer asap. One other thing I want to shout out, I saw what I thought was a really neat multicast ring buffer the other day where the author has an atomic for each element, rather than the typical reader/writer atomics. The promise was having much less contention on any given atomic, in most cases. https://github.com/rezabrizi/SPMC-Queue https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40410172
In Multi-Array Queue

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.