RVS_Spinner

d the code from the principal project, because it was not something that would contribute to the main goal. But I now have this neat little SPM module, ready to be used in other projects. Here's an example of a project that never made it into any of final results, but I think is pretty neat[0]. Some of my modules are basically my "baseline." These are used in everything I do. Many would consider my workstyle "wasteful," but it works for me. [0] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_Spinner

igress. It also made it a huge pain to develop software for these folks. I feel as if there was so much design (that yellow curve), that the software suitability suffered. I consider tech debt to be anything that we say "We'll deal with that down the road." It's really that simple. It may be high issue counts, inflexible design, usability issues, resource usage, cost to maintain, etc. The word "debt" has a lot of shame attached to it. When I first got married, we needed to use a significant portion of our wedding presents to pay off the credit card debt that I brought into the relationship. That was something that caused me great shame, and was a principal motivator for my "live humble and debt-free" philosophy. I have never carried a balance on credit cards, since. So I have a ridiculously high credit score, but I probably would have a hard time actually borrowing money (so I'm told. I haven't actually tried -the mortgage for my house, and leasing cars has never been an issue). But debt can also be used as leverage to grow, or do more. "Tech debt," as the author states, is also often assumed to be the result of "poor code." There's a lot of really badly-written code out there, but much of it is relatively debt-free, due to being tested, encapsulated, and well-maintained. It wasn't allowed past the velvet rope, until it had cleaned up its act. I've also shitcanned dependencies that had well-written code, unit tests, eye-candy Web sites, and great presentation, but suffered serious bugs. To me, "debt" also includes things that are not necessarily "loans." For example, stock purchases or investment is not always done as a "loan," legally. That said, I still consider it an obligation (so..."debt"). That's why defining tech debt as anything "that we'll handle down the road" works best for me. Covers a lot of ground, and removes the emotional baggage. Usability and localization are some things that have resulted in a couple of bent-nose guys telling me how it would be a shame if anything would happen to my kneecaps. Usability, in particular, is a killer. I have designed, implemented, then removed, some pretty fancy widgets, because they proved to be nice on paper, but unsuitable to my needs in practice. An example is my RVS_Spinner widget[0]. It's a solution, in search of a problem. My RVS_Checkbox widget[1], on the other hand, has proven to be marvelously useful. When it comes to usability, in my experience, there's absolutely no substitute for actually putting the code out there, and letting people play with it. Early beta-testing is crucial, and I have found that it's also important that the code be full ship-quality; not lash-up-test quality. That's because, if Management likes the demo, it becomes ship code; whether or not I want it to be so. The downside is that, if rejected, I toss out ship-quality code. Sometimes, I may keep the code, and polish it up for future use (that's one reason that I have so many small module packages out there). Localization and security, in my experience, are things that are easy to manage, if baked in from the start, and a fang-toothed nightmare, if added after the fact. This means that not dealing with those from the start, is a fairly obvious example of "I'll deal with that down the road," that I can live to regret. Since leaving my last employer, I have been experimenting with what I term "ultra-agile" development techniques. I despise tech debt, so I am trying to figure out how to get "the best of both worlds." The results, so far, have been promising, but my scale is, by necessity, fairly small. But that's just my experience. YMMV. [0] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_Spinner#readme [1] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_Checkbox#readme