HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
riscv
riscv-p-spec
Python2023–2026
riscv / riscv-p-spec

riscv-p-spec

RISC-V Packed SIMD Extension

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
185GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

RISC-V Packed SIMD Extension

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-02-15 22:00:45 UTC to 2026-04-26 07:49:25 UTC.

0122023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

3 sources
"It does not natively have common instructions like add multiply"; this is is misinformation. Almost anybody implementing RISC-V -- esp if they are targeting an MPU instead of MCU -- is implementing instruction variants which include signed and unsigned multiply and divide, and my understanding is the P and probably V extensions include various add-multiply instructions. https://github.com/riscv/riscv-p-spec/blob/master/P-ext-prop... See section 3.2. The instruction set is specified in a 'modular' fashion and has standards for various extensions, including compact instructions, vector extensions, etc. Compilers like GCC and LLVM support targeting these extensions. I'm not saying AMD should make a RISC-V CPU, but if they were to hypothetically do that, they'd clearly be including a pile of the ratified extensions.
In AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to Decline

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.