HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
rtsao
csjs
JavaScript2016–2016
rtsao / csjs

csjs

:sparkles: Modular, scoped CSS with ES6

4Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
571GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

:sparkles: Modular, scoped CSS with ES6

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-02-23 13:42:51 UTC to 2016-06-07 19:48:49 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 222016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-04-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-04-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-04-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-04-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-04-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 112016-04-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-04-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-04-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-05-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-05-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-05-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-05-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-05-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-05-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-05-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-05-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-05-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-05-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-06-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-06-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-06-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 6

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 222016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC110
Feb 292016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 72016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC211
Mar 142016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 212016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 282016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC2016-04-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 42016-04-04 00:00:00 UTC2016-04-11 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 112016-04-11 00:00:00 UTC2016-04-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 182016-04-18 00:00:00 UTC2016-04-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 252016-04-25 00:00:00 UTC2016-05-02 00:00:00 UTC000
May 22016-05-02 00:00:00 UTC2016-05-09 00:00:00 UTC000
May 92016-05-09 00:00:00 UTC2016-05-16 00:00:00 UTC000
May 162016-05-16 00:00:00 UTC2016-05-23 00:00:00 UTC000
May 232016-05-23 00:00:00 UTC2016-05-30 00:00:00 UTC000
May 302016-05-30 00:00:00 UTC2016-06-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 62016-06-06 00:00:00 UTC2016-06-13 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
This article echoes my experience this year and last, moving from a Backbone app into React + Fluxxor, and eventually into ES6 with Babel + Flow + Webpack. It's a huge pain to configure and understand all this tooling, but man is it nice once it's all working. It definitely gives me hope for the web as an application platform. Re: Flow, it's good but nowhere near as developed as TypeScript, but it's getting better. 0.22 of Flow (released just a week ago) brought massive speed improvements that bring it decently on par with any other linter. I found I could finally re-enable it in Sublime Text after this release. It catches all kinds of things linters won't, and the upstart cost is relatively low. On the other hand, TS has the benefit of years of type files available for almost any library; don't underestimate how great that is. Using Reac
Read the rest
t has been great as well. It's what I wish Backbone views had been from the beginning. We certainly aren't wanting for choice. Between the dozens of Flux implementations, React alternatives like Mithril, interesting languages like ClojureScript (with Om if you want to keep using React) or Elm, multiple typing systems, and even WASM on the horizon - web development is an exciting field. It's also overwhelming, and I say that as someone who keeps his head in it over 12 hours a day. --- Re: CSS, the story still feels incomplete. I want a way to write a library that will effortlessly import its own styles, so consumers can simply import the component and go to town. Most solutions are severely limited, slow, or both, mostly because they rely on inline styles. Nothing's wrong with inline styles, until you want to do :hover, :active, pseudo elements or the like. See the React material-ui project for a very real example of how this can go wrong - note how every component has a dozen or more extension points for styles. I built a project with this recently and it was intensely frustrating that I couldn't simply add some CSS to the app to fix styles across the board - I needed to keep a giant file of extensions and be sure to apply them every time I used a component. And, of course, component authors can't possibly anticipate every possible use, so some of my selectors were ugly "div > div > ul > li:first-child" monstrosities. CSJS (https://github.com/rtsao/csjs) is one of the few solutions I like. I would be very happy to see it, or something like it, go mainstream.
In State of the Art JavaScript in 2016

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.