HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ruby
rake
Ruby2014–2025
ruby / rake

rake

A make-like build utility for Ruby.

11Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A make-like build utility for Ruby.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:56:56 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-11-04 10:22:17 UTC to 2025-06-20 10:47:14 UTC.

01232014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

12 sources
i agree. make is a tool for defining recipes to derive target files from dependency files. archetypal use case would be compiling and linking a bunch of C source and header files into an application binary. make isn't specialized to building C programs, make can also be used for other file-driven computation tasks such as defining data processing pipelines / graphs of processing that consume data files and produce data files. the rough essence of make is arguably: 1. there are targets, and recipes (written as a shell command) to derive the target 2. targets can express dependencies on other targets 3. targets are files in the filesystem. 4. add a bunch of language features on top (pattern rules, automatic variables, built-in functions, etc) to make it easier to write and maintain the recipes Another way of thinking about make is that it i
Read the rest
s a a way to define and evaluate gigantic pure-functional expressions, where each input and output file is a file, and where intermediate sub-expressions can be cached. for an alternative to make that supports 1+2+3+4, see e.g. https://gittup.org/tup/index.html for an alternative to make that supports 1+2+3 but explicitly does not aim to support 4, see e.g. https://ninja-build.org/manual.html another alternative to make that supports 1+2+3+4 but de-emphasizes 3, "targets are files", from the ruby community, is https://github.com/ruby/rake these days in projects it is quite common to see make used to do 1 but not 2, 3 nor 4. i.e. a makefile as a way to define a bunch of imperative shell recipes for named targets, where each named target has no relationship to a file, and dependencies between the targets aren't expressed or relevant. as a random example of this, here's the first google result searching for "makefile terraform": https://github.com/paulRbr/terraform-makefile/blob/master/Ma... note all the targets are ".PHONY" targets, we're telling make to disable the default behaviour where every target corresponds to a file in the file system -- to turn off "3 targets are files in the filesystem". there's very sparing use of dependencies. so this is an example of using makes support for 1 defining recipes to produce targets and a little splash of 2 dependencies between targets, but not 3 nor 4. it looks like this "jeeves" project is aiming at this latter use case, not attempting to implement support for 2+3, the core of how make is typically used as a build tool
In Show HN: Jeeves – A Pythonic Alternative to GNU Make
Exhibit #1: rake's DSL syntax. It allows "neat" syntax abominations like rule :name, [:param] => [:dep1, 'dep2'] do |t| where every argument except the name can either be missing, single (value) or multiple (array). Sure, it has the "advantage" that it's syntactically valid Ruby code, but it then requires some 70 lines of awful code to actually parse that data into a usable construct: https://github.com/ruby/rake/blob/7b50e9dc37abc57fd365c16cb1...
In An introduction to metaprogramming in Ruby
I agree there's a decent correlation. There are a few notable exceptions/edge cases. For example, Ruby's rake has just ~1,300 stars: https://github.com/ruby/rake It'd be an interesting project to compare frameworks/tools by aggregating the stars (or whatever metric) of its major (i.e. filtering out hobby forks and skeleton repos) dependent projects, e.g. the 22K stars of gatsbyjs/gatsby would count towards React's overall reach/popularity.
In Has Vue passed React yet?
If you have multiple HTML pages, using a templating engine saves a lot of copy/pasting when you change headers, menus etc. (in the article they're using Hugo). You can automate the uploading of files by writing a script to upload the files to the bucket so you can deploy in a single command (it gets trickier if you want to do a sync and delete files). Personally I use rake [0] to create build and deploy tasks so I can do `rake build` and `rake deploy:prod`. [0] https://github.com/ruby/rake
In Building a fast, secured and free static site in less than three hours
While there is a mention of Hacker News, I was surprised to see that the authors apparently hadn't attempted to correlate popularity with Reddit links. Anything that I've had become remotely popular is because it got a few upvotes on HN or Reddit...and anecdotally, I've seen Reddit/HN launch niche libraries into the 1000+ star group, even if the library is relatively niche (hell, I'll star things that look cool and had interesting discussion, even if it's likely I'll never clone/fork the repo) Meanwhile, libraries that were ubiquitous by the time Github became popular have relatively few stars. The most prominent example in my mind is ruby/rake, which has just 627 stars: https://github.com/ruby/rake
In Understanding the Factors That Impact the Popularity of GitHub Repositories

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.