HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
rust-cross
cargo-zigbuild
Rust2022–2025
rust-cross / cargo-zigbuild

cargo-zigbuild

Compile Cargo project with zig as linker

8Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Compile Cargo project with zig as linker

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-02-16 11:59:42 UTC to 2025-11-08 17:23:34 UTC.

01232022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303

What Hacker News says

8 sources
I'm not rooting for Zig [1] but I think there are some misses here, e.g.: > Cross-compilation looks like a standout feature in Zig, although C developers have been doing the same thing for decades. ... You can target an embedded ARM board or a RISC-V chip with one flag: Disagree: Zig's cross-compilation support is better than anything else. For one, installing a toolchain for a different OS/arch combo is not necessarily so easy with C. For another, with Zig you can target an arbitrary Linux glibc version with a commandline argument. Without Zig's toolchain, [2] the best I've seen is to run within a Docker container with that glibc version installed. [1] almost entirely because I think all new languages should have memory safety (via GC or borrow checking). [2] I see people linking Rust programs with Zig's toolchain for this reason: https:
Read the rest
In Zig is so cool, C is cooler
Zig also takes this approach, and even exposes its C compiler (which if I recall correctly is basically Clang plus diverse sysroots and other customisation out of the box) as a separate `zig cc`. I do a lot of work in Rust, and cross-compilation can be a pain when you have a lot of C dependencies. Fortunately https://github.com/messense/cargo-zigbuild exists. It sounds crazy, but using Zig's inbuilt C compiler to help build my Rust projects has been the smoothest option I've found. I can't help but wonder if it would be worth it for Rust to follow D and Zig by shipping its own inbuilt C compiler, even if they still want to also support external C toolchains. It should be roughly the same effort as it was for Zig, given that they both use LLVM.
In C2Rust Transpiler

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.