HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
rust-lang
rustc_codegen_gcc
Rust2021–2026
rust-lang / rustc_codegen_gcc

rustc_codegen_gcc

libgccjit AOT codegen for rustc

18Distinct people
22Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

libgccjit AOT codegen for rustc

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year22 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-12-08 16:07:15 UTC to 2026-07-03 22:09:52 UTC.

02468102021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 0 submissions, 9 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC909
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

2 sources
>> Is it possible that rust also uses MLIR as backend and thus benefits from a modern backend? Compiler backends require corresponding compiler frontends to do lexical analysis and parsing of the programming language into the intermediate representation (IR) that the backend accepts. The Rust compiler frontend currently lexes and compiles Rust source code into LLVM IR. It is possible to create a Rust frontend that lexes and compiles into other intermediate representations and there are several related projects: 1) gccrs (https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs) is creating a GCC frontend for Rust that can be used with the GCC backend. 2) Cranelift (https://cranelift.dev/) is creating an alternate LLVM IR-based backend for Rust written in Rust since the current LLVM backend is written in C++. 3) rustc_codegen_gcc (https://github.com/rust-lan
Read the rest
g/rustc_codegen_gcc) is creating a bridge between the Rust compiler LLVM IR frontend and the GCC backend. So, while it is possible to create a Rust frontend to lex and parse Rust source code into MLIR I am not aware that anyone is working on it.
In Ask HN: Why rust cannot use the same compiler back end as mojo?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.