HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
rust-secure-code
cargo-auditable
Rust2022–2023
rust-secure-code / cargo-auditable

cargo-auditable

Make production Rust binaries auditable

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
876GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Make production Rust binaries auditable

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-08-16 11:28:13 UTC to 2023-01-30 19:58:27 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012022-08-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 152022-08-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-08-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-09-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-09-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-09-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-09-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-09-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-09-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-09-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-09-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-10-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-10-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsNov 72022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-11-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-11-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-12-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-12-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-12-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-12-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-12-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-12-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 30

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 152022-08-15 00:00:00 UTC2022-08-22 00:00:00 UTC101
Aug 222022-08-22 00:00:00 UTC2022-08-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 292022-08-29 00:00:00 UTC2022-09-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 52022-09-05 00:00:00 UTC2022-09-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 122022-09-12 00:00:00 UTC2022-09-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 192022-09-19 00:00:00 UTC2022-09-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 262022-09-26 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 32022-10-03 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 102022-10-10 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 172022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 242022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 312022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 72022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 142022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 212022-11-21 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 282022-11-28 00:00:00 UTC2022-12-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 52022-12-05 00:00:00 UTC2022-12-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 122022-12-12 00:00:00 UTC2022-12-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 192022-12-19 00:00:00 UTC2022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 262022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 22023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 92023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 162023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 232023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 302023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-06 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
> and static compilation probably just hides the problem unless security scanners these days can identify statically compiled vulnerable versions of libraries Some scanners like trivy [1] can scan statically compiled binaries, provided they include dependency version information (I think go does this on its own, for rust there's [2], not sure about other languages). It also looks into your containers. The problem is what to do when it finds a vulnerability. In a fat app with dynamic linking you could exchange the offending library, check that this doesn't break anything for your use case, and be on your way. But with static linking you need to compile a new version, or get whoever can build it to compile a new version. Which seems to be a major drawback of discouraging fat apps. 1: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy 2: https://github.
Read the rest
In Swift Achieved Dynamic Linking Where Rust Couldn't (2019)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.